Literature DB >> 15385832

Everolimus therapeutic concentration range defined from a prospective trial with reduced-exposure cyclosporine in de novo kidney transplantation.

John M Kovarik1, Helio Tedesco, Julio Pascual, Giovanni Civati, Marie-Noelle Bizot, Johanna Geissler, Heinz Schmidli.   

Abstract

Prospective therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was performed in a 1-year multicenter trial in 237 de novo kidney transplant patients. Trough blood levels, rejection episodes, and safety parameters were evaluated to define an appropriate therapeutic concentration range for everolimus in this setting. Patients were randomized to everolimus starting doses of 0.75 mg bid (n = 112) or 1.5 mg bid (n = 125). Doses were then individualized based on everolimus trough blood levels (C0) in an attempt to maintain troughs > or = 3 ng/mL; no upper limit was specified. The regimen also contained corticosteroids and cyclosporine with an early dose reduction in months 2-3 posttransplant based on concentrations 2 hours postdose (C2). Cyclosporine C0 levels were also collected. Prospective therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus C0 in patients starting at 0.75 mg bid led to dose adjustments in 52% of patients to an average long-term dose of 0.93 +/- 0.36 mg bid. This gave median (10th to 90th percentile) C0 levels of 5.3 (3.4-7.9) ng/mL. In patients starting at 1.5 mg bid, 55% had dose adjustments leading to an average long-term dose of 1.24 +/- 0.35 mg bid. This yielded C0 levels of 7.2 (4.4-11.6) ng/mL. Cyclosporine dosing began on average at 274 +/- 78 mg bid, was down-titrated in months 2-3 from 181 +/- 80 mg to 81 +/- 33 mg bid, and stabilized at 70 +/- 26 mg bid thereafter. This yielded median C2 levels of 1165 ng/mL in month 1, a down-titration with levels of 853 and 630 ng/mL in months 2 and 3, and a posttitration level of 472 ng/mL. The corresponding median cyclosporine C0 was 242 ng/mL initially and 70 ng/mL in the posttitration phase. In patients starting at 0.75 mg bid everolimus and an early down-titration of cyclosporine, everolimus C0 between 3 and 8 ng/mL was an effective and safe concentration range. Concentrations up to 12 ng/mL were tolerated over the first year posttransplant. This trial demonstrated that therapeutic monitoring of everolimus can be prospectively performed for dose individualization. Maintaining everolimus troughs in the range 3 to 8 ng/mL in the first posttransplant year with reduced-exposure cyclosporine is associated with good efficacy and safety profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15385832     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200410000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  18 in total

Review 1.  Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Krishna M Karpe; Girish S Talaulikar; Giles D Walters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-21

2.  Long-term cross-validation of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring assays: the Zortracker study.

Authors:  Björn Schniedewind; Stefanie Niederlechner; Jeffrey L Galinkin; Kamisha L Johnson-Davis; Uwe Christians; Eric J Meyer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of everolimus in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Dirk Jan A R Moes; Rogier R Press; Jan den Hartigh; Tahar van der Straaten; Johan W de Fijter; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and everolimus in healthy subjects.

Authors:  J M Kovarik; D Beyer; M N Bizot; Q Jiang; M J Allison; R L Schmouder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Effect of multiple-dose erythromycin on everolimus pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J M Kovarik; D Beyer; M N Bizot; Q Jiang; M Shenouda; R L Schmouder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.

Authors:  J Michael Tredger; Nigel W Brown; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Racial comparisons of everolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  David J Taber; Lindsey Belk; Holly Meadows; Nicole Pilch; James Fleming; Titte Srinivas; John McGillicuddy; Charles Bratton; Kenneth Chavin; Prabhakar Baliga
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Patrick B Mark; Rajan K Patel; Kate K Stevens; Nicholas Palmer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Sirolimus and everolimus clearance in maintenance kidney and liver transplant recipients: diagnostic efficiency of the concentration/dose ratio for the prediction of trough steady-state concentrations.

Authors:  Lorena Bouzas; Jesús Hermida; J Carlos Tutor
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.384

10.  Everolimus and sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine have different effects on renal metabolism in the rat.

Authors:  Rahul Bohra; Wenzel Schöning; Jelena Klawitter; Nina Brunner; Volker Schmitz; Touraj Shokati; Ryan Lawrence; Maria Fernanda Arbelaez; Björn Schniedewind; Uwe Christians; Jost Klawitter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.