OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine clinical roles for 3D CT hepatic venography in the evaluation of peripheral hepatic venous anatomy during living-donor liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised 54 donors (age range, 20-60 years) who had undergone surgery to donate a liver for transplantation. Visualization of each hepatic venous branch and total visualization using 3D CT hepatic venography were evaluated. Maximum venous branch order visualized was graded as nil, first branch, second branch, or third branch or more. The distance between the hepatic surface and the tip of each hepatic venous branch was classified as 0-5 mm, 6-10 mm, 11-15 mm, 16-20 mm, or 21-25 mm. Quality of total 3D CT hepatic venography was evaluated subjectively as poor, good, fair, or excellent. Dominance of large hepatic veins in the right lobe, peripheral branching pattern of the middle hepatic vein, and branching pattern of the vein draining segment IVb were also assessed. RESULTS: Most hepatic venous branches (96.2% [275/286]) were visualized up to at least the second-order branches, and 93.7% (268/286) of branches were within 10 mm of the hepatic surface. As for total visualization, 98% (53/54) of cases were regarded as excellent. The dominant vein in the right lobe was the right hepatic vein in 27 cases, inferior hepatic vein in 25, and middle hepatic vein in one. The branching pattern of the middle hepatic vein was type 1 in 36 cases, type 2 in nine, and type 3 in eight. Segment IVb vein branched from the middle hepatic vein in 20 patients, and from the left hepatic vein in 34. CONCLUSION: Because 3D CT hepatic venography visualizes peripheral hepatic venous branches in detail, the technique is useful for determining operative indications in living-donor liver transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine clinical roles for 3D CT hepatic venography in the evaluation of peripheral hepatic venous anatomy during living-donor liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised 54 donors (age range, 20-60 years) who had undergone surgery to donate a liver for transplantation. Visualization of each hepatic venous branch and total visualization using 3D CT hepatic venography were evaluated. Maximum venous branch order visualized was graded as nil, first branch, second branch, or third branch or more. The distance between the hepatic surface and the tip of each hepatic venous branch was classified as 0-5 mm, 6-10 mm, 11-15 mm, 16-20 mm, or 21-25 mm. Quality of total 3D CT hepatic venography was evaluated subjectively as poor, good, fair, or excellent. Dominance of large hepatic veins in the right lobe, peripheral branching pattern of the middle hepatic vein, and branching pattern of the vein draining segment IVb were also assessed. RESULTS: Most hepatic venous branches (96.2% [275/286]) were visualized up to at least the second-order branches, and 93.7% (268/286) of branches were within 10 mm of the hepatic surface. As for total visualization, 98% (53/54) of cases were regarded as excellent. The dominant vein in the right lobe was the right hepatic vein in 27 cases, inferior hepatic vein in 25, and middle hepatic vein in one. The branching pattern of the middle hepatic vein was type 1 in 36 cases, type 2 in nine, and type 3 in eight. Segment IVb vein branched from the middle hepatic vein in 20 patients, and from the left hepatic vein in 34. CONCLUSION: Because 3D CT hepatic venography visualizes peripheral hepatic venous branches in detail, the technique is useful for determining operative indications in living-donor liver transplantation.