Literature DB >> 15385130

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node staging: the University of Southern California experience.

Alexander F Burnett1, Anne T O'Meara, Afshin Bahador, Lynda D Roman, C Paul Morrow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with extraperitoneal lymph node staging in gynecologic oncology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The extraperitoneal approach was performed to assess the lymph node histology in patients with gynecologic malignancies. The nodes are approached from a lateral approach after dissecting open the extraperitoneal space bluntly and with insufflation. Bilateral aortic nodes are taken from a left-sided or right-sided approach depending on the patient's characteristics.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent this procedure over a 2.5-year period. Thirty-seven patients had cervical cancer. The median BMI was 27.1 (17.7-38.1). The median lymph node yield was 14 (0-60). Two patients had disruption of the peritoneum such that the aortic lymphadenectomy had to be completed transperitoneally. No patients required laparotomy. No patients required transfusion. DISCUSSION: This technique permits histologic evaluation of the retroperitoneal nodes with minimal risk of intraabdominal adhesions. Recovery is rapid and further therapy can be prescribed shortly. The data on the nodes can assist in treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15385130     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Delphine Hudry; Francesco Cannone; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Max Buttarelli; Camille Jauffret; Elisabeth Chéreau; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Anuja Jhingran; Homer A Macapinlac; Elizabeth D Euscher; Mark F Munsell; Robert L Coleman; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Robotic surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina; Vanna L Zanagnolo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.