Literature DB >> 1538452

Meatal advancement and glanuloplasty hypospadias repair after 1,000 cases: avoidance of meatal stenosis and regression.

J W Duckett1, H M Snyder.   

Abstract

We first described the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty (MAGPI) procedure in 1981 as a technique to repair distal hypospadias. During the last 10 years our experience has increased to more than 1,000 cases. Case selection is critical to surgical outcome. Excessively thin or rigid ventral parameatal skin, or a meatus that is too proximal or too wide must be avoided. To prevent the ventral meatal wall from falling back and leaving a retrusive meatus, the glans wrap to support the advanced ventral urethral wall requires a solid approximation of glans tissue in 2 layers. Meatal stenosis may be avoided by an adequately deep dorsal Heineke-Mikulicz tissue rearrangement, making the incision from within the urethral meatus distally into the glanular urethral groove. The MAGPI procedure is routinely performed on an outpatient basis without urinary diversion. A review of our experience with 1,111 cases during a 12-year period reveals that a secondary procedure was required in only 1.2%. The overall success rate with the MAGPI procedure suggests that it should continue to be an important operation in the reconstruction of distal hypospadias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538452     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Concepts for correction of penile hypospadias].

Authors:  M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The extended Mathieu procedure in coronal, distal penile, and midshaft hypospadias repair.

Authors:  M Orkiszewski
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Urethral advancement and glanuloplasty UAGP vs. MAGPI for distal hypospadias repair.

Authors:  A J Jawad
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Short-term catheterization after TIP repair in distal hypospadias: who are the best candidates?

Authors:  Ahmet R Aslan; Ergin Yücebaş; Ali Tekin; Feridun Sengör; Barry A Kogan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Comparative Study of Modifying Meatal Advancement Glandular with Release Chordi versus Snodgrass Surgical Methods Regarding the Repair of Distal Hypospadias.

Authors:  Shahnam Askarpour; Mehran Peyvasteh; Armin Mohamadi; Mahmoud Khoshkhabar
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09

6.  Clinical experiences with different one-staged surgical methods for primary hypospadias cases.

Authors:  M Abdurrahim Imamoğlu; Hasan Bakirtaş; Can Tuygun; Hamit Ersoy; Nurettin Sertçelik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Long-term outcome following hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Duncan Wilcox; Warren Snodgrass
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Hypospadias repair and glans augmentation using a modified Mathieu technique.

Authors:  Behtash Ghazi Nezami; Amir Hassan Mahboubi; Roozbeh Tanhaeivash; Ali Tourchi; Abdol Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  Recent advances in understanding/management of hypospadias.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Nicol Bush
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-11-04

Review 10.  Primary hypospadias repair techniques: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Nicol Bush
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.