Literature DB >> 15384295

Average recovery time from a standardized intravenous sedation protocol and standardized discharge criteria in the general dental practice setting.

A J Lepere1, L M Slack-Smith.   

Abstract

Intravenous sedation has been used in dentistry for many years because of its perceived advantages over general anesthesia, including shorter recovery times. However, there is limited literature available on recovery from intravenous dental sedation, particularly in the private general practice setting. The aim of this study was to describe the recovery times when sedation was conducted in private dental practice and to consider this in relation to age, weight, procedure type, and procedure time. The data were extracted from the intravenous sedation records available with 1 general anesthesia-trained dental practitioner who provides ambulatory sedation services to a number of private general dental practices in the Perth, Western Australia Metropolitan Area. Standardized intravenous sedation techniques as well as clear standardized discharge criteria were utilized. The sedatives used were fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol. Results from 85 patients produced an average recovery time of 19 minutes. Recovery time was not associated with the type or length of dental procedures performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15384295      PMCID: PMC2007342     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  12 in total

1.  Computerised dynamic posturography to assess recovery comparing general anaesthesia with sedation and local anaesthesia for day case nasal surgery.

Authors:  R Makker; P Bailey; R Royston; E Kulinskaya
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Comparison of recovery of propofol and methohexital sedation using an infusion pump.

Authors:  M Cohen; S Eisig; R A Kraut
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

3.  Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation.

Authors:  F G Fedok; R E Ferraro; C P Kingsley; J A Fornadley
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  A postanesthetic recovery score.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; D Kroulik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Premedication in dentistry.

Authors:  N B Jorgensen; F Leffingwell
Journal:  J Philipp Dent Assoc       Date:  1967-09

6.  Recovery following intravenous sedation during dental surgery performed under local anesthesia.

Authors:  S S Gelfman; R H Gracely; E J Driscoll; D Butler; J B Sweet; P R Wirdzek
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Propofol sedation in general dental practice: the first 100 patients.

Authors:  K Ruiz; S A Coldwell; N Hitchin; E Dresner-Black
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

8.  Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.

Authors:  N A Sandler; J Hodges; M Sabino
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia.

Authors:  A Shafer; V A Doze; S L Shafer; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Pharmacokinetics of flumazenil and midazolam.

Authors:  R D Jones; K Chan; C J Roulson; A G Brown; I D Smith; G H Mya
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  Practice Guidelines for Intravenous Conscious Sedation in Dentistry (Second Edition, 2017).

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

2.  Is procedural sedation with propofol acceptable for complex imaging? A comparison of short vs. prolonged sedations in children.

Authors:  Mark A Griffiths; Pradip P Kamat; Courtney E McCracken; Harold K Simon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-07

3.  Optimal and safe standard doses of midazolam and propofol to achieve patient and doctor satisfaction with dental treatment: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rikuo Masuda; Mutsumi Nonaka; Akiko Nishimura; Kinuko Gotoh; Shuichirou Oka; Takehiko Iijima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.