Literature DB >> 15383193

Efficacy of trimetazidine in patients with recurrent angina: a subgroup analysis of the TRIMPOL II study.

W Ruzyllo1, H Szwed, Z Sadowski, W Elikowski, H Grzelak-Szafranska, W Orszulak, K Szymczak, M Winter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The revascularization procedures become more and more popular to treat coronary artery disease, in many countries. Some patients are free of angina after revascularization, without any documented re-stenosis present with recurrent angina symptoms after a period of time. The aim of this work was to assess the efficacy of trimetazidine in the subpopulation of patients with a history of PTCA or CABG, who were included in the TRIMPOL II study.
METHODOLOGY: A subgroup of 94 patients was retrospectively analysed from the TRIMPOL II study, a multicentre, double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial in 426 patients with stable effort angina. These patients have a history of revascularization for coronary artery disease, and they are still symptomatic after 6 months despite a treatment with metoprolol (50 mg twice daily). They were randomly allocated to receive either trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times daily) or placebo for 12 weeks, on top of the beta-blocker. Exercise test parameters, clinical efficacy and safety were assessed. Results were analysed using the Student test, the Mann-Whitney test or the Shapiro-Wilk test.
RESULTS: Compared to placebo, the 12-week treatment with trimetazidine significantly improved: time to 1 mm ST segment depression (385.1 s +/- 144.6 s versus 465.0 s +/- 143.8 s [p < 0.01]); exercise test duration (466.9 s +/- 144.8 s versus 524.4 s +/- 131.5 s [p = 0.048]), total workload (9.0 m.e. +/- 2.4 m.e versus 10.1 m.e. +/- 2.4 m.e [p = 0.035]) as well as time to onset of angina (433.6 s +/- 164 s versus 508.1 s +/- 132.4 s [p = 0.031]). Weekly number of angina attacks and nitrate consumption were significantly reduced in the trimetazidine group when compared to placebo. Three mild gastro-intestinal side-effects were reported in the trimetazidine group.
CONCLUSION: These results show that trimetazidine provides anti-anginal efficacy in post-revascularized patients with recurrent angina despite a monotherapy with metoprolol. The treatment was well accepted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383193     DOI: 10.1185/030079904X2637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

1.  Recurrent angina after coronary angioplasty: mechanisms, diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Paolo Izzo; Andrea Macchi; Luisa De Gennaro; Antonio Gaglione; Matteo Di Biase; Natale Daniele Brunetti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Metabolic modulation of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Sonal Jani; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Trimetazidine in Practice: Review of the Clinical and Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Csaba A Dézsi
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  ACPTI study: Being positive in a negative situation is not naivety - Trimetazidine still has role in symptomatic CAD patients.

Authors:  Jamshed Dalal; Aditya Kapoor
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-12-30

5.  The Impact of Trimetazidine Treatment on Left Ventricular Functions and Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Selami Demirelli; Sule Karakelleoğlu; Fuat Gündoğdu; Muhammed Hakan Taş; Ahmet Kaya; Hakan Duman; Hüsnü Değirmenci; Hikmet Hamur; Ziya Simşek
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Trimetazidine and Bisoprolol to Treat Angina in Symptomatic Patients: Post Hoc Analysis From the CHOICE-2 Study.

Authors:  Maria Glezer
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-11-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.