Literature DB >> 15383110

Diamorphine for pain relief in labour : a randomised controlled trial comparing intramuscular injection and patient-controlled analgesia.

Rhona J McInnes1, Edith Hillan, Diana Clark, Harper Gilmour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of diamorphine administered by a patient-controlled pump (patient-controlled analgesia) with intramuscular administration for pain relief in labour.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: The South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust. SAMPLE: Primigravidae and multigravidae in labour at term (37-42 weeks).
METHODS: Women were randomised in labour to the study (patient-controlled analgesia) or control group (intramuscular). Randomisation was achieved through a random permuted block design stratified by parity. Study group women were given a loading dose of 1.2 mg diamorphine intravenously and then attached to the pump. Control group women received intramuscular diamorphine as per hospital protocol. Participants were also given 3 mg of buccal Stemetil. Data were collected throughout labour and at six postnatal weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analgesia requirements during labour and women's satisfaction with the method of pain relief.
RESULTS: Women in the study group (patient-controlled analgesia) used significantly less diamorphine than women in the control group (intramuscular) but were significantly more likely to state that they were very dissatisfied with their use of diamorphine and were significantly more likely to opt out of the trial before the birth of the baby. The majority of women in both groups used other analgesia concurrent with diamorphine such as Entonox, aromatherapy or TENS.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled analgesia administration of diamorphine for the relief of pain in labour offers no significant advantages over intramuscular administration. The results also suggest that diamorphine is a poor analgesic for labour pain irrespective of the mode of administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383110     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Evelyn Rhodes; Tyler Bourgoise; George M Carter; Robert S White; Debbie Indyk; Henry Sacks; Rosamond Rhodes
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Stakeholders' Views on Barriers to Research on Controversial Controlled Substances.

Authors:  Evelyn Rhodes; Michael Andreae; Tyler Bourgiose; Debbie Indyk; Rosamond Rhodes; Henry Sacks
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.

Authors:  Roz Ullman; Lesley A Smith; Ethel Burns; Rintaro Mori; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

4.  The management of breakthrough pain during labour.

Authors:  Nicholas Akerman; Martin Dresner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Pain relief in labor: a survey of awareness, attitude, and practice of health care providers in Zaria, Nigeria.

Authors:  E Ogboli-Nwasor; Se Adaji; Sb Bature; Os Shittu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.

Authors:  Lesley A Smith; Ethel Burns; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 7.  Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic labor pain management techniques in a resource-limited setting: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amare Anley Beyable; Samuel Debas Bayable; Yitayal Guadie Ashebir
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.