Literature DB >> 15382185

Pad tests and self-reports of continence in men awaiting radical prostatectomy: establishing baseline norms for males.

Katherine Moore1, Marion Allen, Donald C Voaklander.   

Abstract

AIMS: In this study, we report normal pad weight gain in a group self-reported continent men and compare the self-report data with the 24-hr pad test and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects awaiting radical prostatectomy were consecutively recruited. Exclusion criteria were a previous history of urologic surgery, reported urinary incontinence, or a medical problem which could affect bladder function.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty five men were enrolled. All were Caucasian, mean age 62.7 years, mean Gleason score 6.5, and mean PSA 8.3. At initial interview, all described themselves as continent of urine and 26 declined the 24-hr pad test because they were emphatic that they were continent. Of the 220 remaining, mean pad weight gain was 4.0 g on 24-hr pad test (SD 3.8; range 0-35.0 g), mean IPSS score was 7.23; 95 subjects scored > or = 8 (moderate), 13 scored > or = 20 (severe). The IPSS single Quality of Life (QOL) question and the 24 hr pad weight were not correlated; the summary IPSS score and pad weight had a correlation of 0.16 (P = 0.02) and the QOL question and the summary IPSS score had a correlation of 0.63 (P < 0.001). IPSS QOL scores were worse for those recording > or = 8 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The range of weight gain between 0 and 35 g suggests that self-report alone of urinary continence is an inaccurate measure of continence for research purposes. We propose that a pad weight gain of 8 g or less is indicative of urinary continence in men. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382185     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  7 in total

1.  The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Kurimura; Nobuhiro Haga; Tomohiko Yanagida; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Ruriko Honda; Kanako Matsuoka; Seiji Hoshi; Junya Hata; Mitsutaka Onoda; Yuichi Sato; Hidenori Akaihata; Masao Kataoka; Soichiro Ogawa; Kei Ishibashi; Akio Matsubara; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cystectomy in organ-confined bladder cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Gianni Martis; Gianluca D'Elia; Massimo Diana; Maurizio Ombres; Bruno Mastrangeli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) greater than 70 cm H2O is an indicator for sling success: a success prediction model for the male transobturator sling.

Authors:  Divya Ajay; Arman A Kahokehr; Aaron C Lentz; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Urinary Incontinence Could Be Controlled by an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Hyun Min Choi; Hyung Ki Choi; Hye-Yeon Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.400

5.  Feasibility of Presurgical Exercise in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Favil Singh; Robert U Newton; Michael K Baker; Nigel A Spry; Dennis R Taaffe; Jeffery Thavaseelan; Daniel A Galvão
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data.

Authors:  Anna R Smither; Michael L Guralnick; Nancy B Davis; William A See
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Prospective evaluation of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a validated questionnaire and daily pad use assessment: which definition is more relevant to the patient's perception of recovery?

Authors:  Akram Assem; Seif M Hamdy; Ahmad M Beltagy; Ali Serdar Gӧzen; Tamer Abou Youssif
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.