Literature DB >> 15382147

High-throughput laser-mediated in situ cell purification with high purity and yield.

Manfred R Koller1, Elie G Hanania, Janine Stevens, Timothy M Eisfeld, Glenn C Sasaki, Annabeth Fieck, Bernhard Ø Palsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technologies for purification of living cells have significantly advanced basic and applied research in many settings. Nevertheless, certain challenges remain, including the robust and efficient purification (e.g., high purity, yield, and sterility) of adherent and/or fragile cells and small cell samples, efficient cell cloning, and safe purification of biohazardous cells. In addition, existing purification methods are generally open loop and exhibit an inverse relation between cell purity and yield.
METHODS: An automated closed-loop (i.e., employing feedback control) cell purification technology was developed by building upon medical laser applications and laser-based semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Laser-enabled analysis and processing has combined high-throughput in situ cell imaging with laser-mediated cell manipulation via large field-of-view optics and galvanometer steering. Laser parameters were determined for cell purification using three mechanisms (photothermal, photochemical, and photomechanical), followed by demonstration of system performance and utility.
RESULTS: Photothermal purification required approximately 10(8) W/cm(2) at 523 nm in the presence of Allura Red, resulting in immediate protein coagulation and cell necrosis. Photochemical purification required approximately 10(9) W/cm(2) at 355 nm, resulting in apoptosis induction over 4 to 24 h. Photomechanical purification required more than 10(10) W/cm(2) independent of wavelength, resulting in immediate cell lysis. Each approach resulted in high efficiency purification (>99%) after a single operation, as demonstrated with eight cell types. An automated closed-loop process to re-image and irradiate remaining targets in situ was implemented, resulting in improved purification (99.5-100%) without decreasing cell yield or affecting sterility in this closed system. Efficient purification was demonstrated with B- and T-cell mixtures over a wide range of contaminating cell percentages (0.1-99%) and cell densities (10(4)-10(6)/cm(2)). Efficient cloning of 293T cells based on fluorescence with green fluorescent protein after plasmid transfection was also demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: In situ laser-mediated purification was achieved with nonadherent and adherent cells on the automated laser-enabled analysis and processing platform. Closed-loop processing routinely enabled greater than 99.5% purity with a greater than 90% cell yield in sample sizes ranging from 10(1) to 10(8) cells. Throughput ranged from approximately 10(3) to 10(5) total cells/s for contaminating percentages ranging from 99% to 0.1%, respectively. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382147     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  14 in total

1.  Methods of cell purification: a critical juncture for laboratory research and translational science.

Authors:  Peter J Amos; Esra Cagavi Bozkulak; Yibing Qyang
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Laser-assisted photoablation of human pluripotent stem cells from differentiating cultures.

Authors:  Stefanie Terstegge; Franziska Winter; Barbara H Rath; Iris Laufenberg; Claudia Schwarz; Anke Leinhaas; Florian Levold; Andreas Dolf; Simone Haupt; Philipp Koch; Elmar Endl; Oliver Brüstle
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  A high throughput, interactive imaging, bright-field wound healing assay.

Authors:  Michael D Zordan; Christopher P Mill; David J Riese; James F Leary
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  Advances in complex multiparameter flow cytometry technology: Applications in stem cell research.

Authors:  Frederic Preffer; David Dombkowski
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.058

Review 5.  Better and faster: improvements and optimization for mammalian recombinant protein production.

Authors:  Steven C Almo; James D Love
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Image-predicated sorting of adherent cells using photopatterned hydrogels.

Authors:  Joseph Kovac; Ylaine Gerardin; Joel Voldman
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Laser-Based Propagation of Human iPS and ES Cells Generates Reproducible Cultures with Enhanced Differentiation Potential.

Authors:  Kristi A Hohenstein Elliott; Cory Peterson; Anuradha Soundararajan; Natalia Kan; Brandon Nelson; Sean Spiering; Mark Mercola; Gary R Bright
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.443

8.  Automated single cell isolation from suspension with computer vision.

Authors:  Rita Ungai-Salánki; Tamás Gerecsei; Péter Fürjes; Norbert Orgovan; Noémi Sándor; Eszter Holczer; Robert Horvath; Bálint Szabó
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Immuno-Magnetically Sorted Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells Derived from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Restoring Urethral Sphincter Function.

Authors:  Yanhui Li; Morgaine Green; Yan Wen; Yi Wei; Prachi Wani; Zhe Wang; Renee Reijo Pera; Bertha Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Advances in Mammalian cell line development technologies for recombinant protein production.

Authors:  Tingfeng Lai; Yuansheng Yang; Say Kong Ng
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2013-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.