Literature DB >> 15381289

Differential growth of axons from sensory and motor neurons through a regenerative electrode: a stereological, retrograde tracer, and functional study in the rat.

P Negredo1, J Castro, N Lago, X Navarro, C Avendaño.   

Abstract

Polyimide regenerative electrodes (RE) constitute a promising neural interface to selectively stimulate regenerating fibers in injured nerves. The characteristics of the regeneration through an implanted RE, however, are only beginning to be established. It was recently shown that the number of myelinated fibers distal to the implant reached control values 7 months postimplant; however, the functional recovery remained substantially below normal [J Biomed Mater Res 60 (2002) 517]. In this study we sought to determine the magnitude, and possible selectivity, of axonal regeneration through the RE by counting sensory and motor neurons that were retrogradely labeled from double tracer deposits in the sciatic nerve. Adult rats had their right sciatic nerves transected, and the stumps were placed in silicone tubes; some simply were filled with saline (Tube group), and others held a RE in its center (RE group). Simultaneously, the proximal stump was exposed to Diamidino Yellow. Two months later the nerves were bilaterally excised distal to the implant, and exposed to Fast Blue. Electrophysiological recordings, and skin nociceptive responses confirmed previous findings of partial functional recovery. In controls, an average of 20,000 and 3080 neurons were labeled in L4-L5 dorsal root ganglia (with minor contributions from L3 and/or L6), and in the ventral horn of the lumbar spinal cord, respectively. In the regenerating side, 35% of the DRG neurons were double-labeled, without differences between groups. In contrast, only 7.5% of motoneurons were double-labeled in the RE group, vs. 21% in the Tube group. Moreover, smaller ganglion cells regenerated better than large neurons by a significant 13.8%. These results indicate that the RE is not an obstacle for the re-growth of sensory fibers, but partially hinders fiber regeneration from motoneurons. They also suggest that fine fibers may be at an advantage over large ones to regenerate through the RE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15381289     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

Review 1.  Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of micro- and nanoelectrodes for neural recording.

Authors:  Anoop C Patil; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Pouria Fattahi; Guang Yang; Gloria Kim; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Sensory axons inhibit motor axon regeneration in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas Brushart; Floreana Kebaish; Rachel Wolinsky; Richard Skolasky; Zhi Li; Norman Barker
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 4.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

5.  Maximizing Explanatory Power in Stereological Data Collection: A Protocol for Reliably Integrating Optical Fractionator and Multiple Immunofluorescence Techniques.

Authors:  Anna Kreutz; Nicole Barger
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.856

Review 6.  Wearable and Implantable Electroceuticals for Therapeutic Electrostimulations.

Authors:  Yin Long; Jun Li; Fan Yang; Jingyu Wang; Xudong Wang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 16.806

7.  Physiotherapeutic techniques used in the management of patients with peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Krzysztof Suszyński; Wiesław Marcol; Dariusz Górka
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.