Literature DB >> 15380963

Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial.

Francisco Fernandez-Avilés1, Joaquín J Alonso, Alfonso Castro-Beiras, Nicolás Vázquez, Jesús Blanco, Juan Alonso-Briales, Juan López-Mesa, Felipe Fernández-Vazquez, Isabel Calvo, Luis Martínez-Elbal, José A San Román, Benigo Ramos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), early post-thrombolysis routine angioplasty has been discouraged because of its association with high incidence of events. The GRACIA-1 trial was designed to reassess the benefits of an early post-thrombolysis interventional approach in the era of stents and new antiplatelet agents.
METHODS: 500 patients with thrombolysed STEMI (with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) were randomly assigned to angiography and intervention if indicated within 24 h of thrombolysis, or to an ischaemia-guided conservative approach. The primary endpoint was the combined rate of death, reinfarction, or revascularisation at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Invasive treatment included stenting of the culprit artery in 80% (199 of 248) patients, bypass surgery in six (2%), non-culprit artery stenting in three, and no intervention in 40 (16%). Predischarge revascularisation was needed in 51 of 252 patients in the conservative group. By comparison with patients receiving conservative treatment, by 1 year, patients in the invasive group had lower frequency of primary endpoint (23 [9%] vs 51 [21%], risk ratio 0.44 [95% CI 0.28-0.70], p=0.0008), and they tended to have reduced rate of death or reinfarction (7% vs 12%, 0.59 [0.33-1.05], p=0.07). Index time in hospital was shorter in the invasive group, with no differences in major bleeding or vascular complications. At 30 days both groups had a similar incidence of cardiac events. In-hospital incidence of revascularisation induced by spontaneous recurrence of ischaemia was higher in patients in the conservative group than in those in the invasive group.
INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI, early post-thrombolysis catheterisation and appropriate intervention is safe and might be preferable to a conservative strategy since it reduces the need for unplanned in-hospital revascularisation, and improves 1-year clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15380963     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17059-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  43 in total

Review 1.  Toward a comprehensive approach to pharmacoinvasive therapy for patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Burton E Sobel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Temporal decline in the prognostic impact of a recurrent acute myocardial infarction 1985 to 2002.

Authors:  P Buch; S Rasmussen; G H Gislason; J N Rasmussen; L Køber; N Gadsbøll; S Stender; M Madsen; C Torp-Pedersen; S Z Abildstrom
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jonathan N Townend; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-16

4.  Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction: primary angioplasty has strong evidence base.

Authors:  Michael P Pitt; Gordon Murray; James Beattie; Nadia El Gaylani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-28

Review 5.  Immediate angioplasty after thrombolysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Warren J Cantor; Fabrice Brunet; Carolyn P Ziegler; Alex Kiss; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: is this strategy ready for implementation?

Authors:  Derek P Chew; Phil Aylward; Harvey D White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Thrombolysis: past, present, and future.

Authors:  D Gray
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention: does the concept make sense?

Authors:  Eric Eeckhout
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Therapeutic options in coronary artery disease: focusing on the guidelines.

Authors:  Leonard Schwartz
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.