Literature DB >> 15380019

Why do we produce errors of commission? An ERP study of stimulus deviance detection and error monitoring in a choice go/no-go task.

Martin Elton1, Marcus Spaan, K Richard Ridderinkhof.   

Abstract

The present study investigated event-related brain potential (ERP) reflections of stimulus deviance detection and error monitoring recorded during a go/no-go auditory oddball task. The mismatch negativity and error negativity were analysed as indices of these processes, respectively. We examined whether errors of commission occurred because of failures to detect stimulus deviance. On error trials the mismatch negativity amplitude did not differ between big and small deviant stimuli and was clearly reduced as compared with mismatch negativity amplitude on correct trials. Following an error response an error negativity was elicited, the amplitude of which was unaffected by stimulus deviancy. This pattern of ERP results was interpreted as supporting the defective deviance detection hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15380019     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03631.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  3 in total

1.  Mismatch task conditions and error related ERPs.

Authors:  Irene S Karanasiou; Charalabos Papageorgiou; Eleni I Tsianaka; Miltiades Kyprianou; George K Matsopoulos; Errikos M Ventouras; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.759

2.  Drink alcohol and dim the lights: the impact of cognitive deficits on medial frontal cortex function.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Jason Ralph; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Performance Monitoring Applied to System Supervision.

Authors:  Bertille Somon; Aurélie Campagne; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.