BACKGROUND: Small bowel tumours are uncommon and can have a long delay prior to diagnosis. The present study aims to compare the use of computed tomography (CT) and contrast small bowel series (SBS) in their diagnosis and to outline the clinical features of small bowel tumours. METHODS: A retrospective, case note study was conducted between 1990 and 2000 in four Sydney teaching hospitals. The data collected included clinical features, investigations and tumour characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six people with small bowel tumours were identified (91 malignant; 75 benign). Malignant tumours consisted of adenocarcinomas (31%), carcinoid tumours (12%), lymphomas (7%) and leiomyosarcomas (5%). Benign tumours consisted of adenomas (22%), hamartomas (13%), leiomyomas (4%), inflammatory polyps (4%) and hyperplastic polyps (2%) and a benign schwannoma (1%). Adenocarcinomas were mainly located in the duodenum (P < 0.001) and carcinoid tumours in the ileum (P < 0.001). Malignant tumours were associated with a higher proportion of symptoms (P < 0.01), signs (P < 0.001) and episodes of small bowel obstruction (P < 0.01). Abdominal CT scans demonstrated a greater sensitivity (87.7%) than SBS (72.9%) with a slightly improved sensitivity when both investigations were used (89.3%). Abdominal ultrasound had a lower sensitivity than both of the above investigations of 65%. Gastroduodenoscopy had a sensitivity of 90% for diagnosing duodenal tumours. Operative procedures were performed on 92 patients with a preoperative diagnosis made in 77%. Metastatic spread of malignant tumours was evident in 46%. The sites of spread were to lymph nodes (23%), liver (21%) and distant locations (2%) at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant small bowel tumours are more likely to produce symptoms and signs than benign tumours, particularly caused by small bowel obstruction. Abdominal CT is the best radiological investigation for small bowel tumours and has a slight complimentary effect with SBS in improving the chances of detection. Gastroduodenoscopy remains the best investigation of duodenal tumours.
BACKGROUND:Small bowel tumours are uncommon and can have a long delay prior to diagnosis. The present study aims to compare the use of computed tomography (CT) and contrast small bowel series (SBS) in their diagnosis and to outline the clinical features of small bowel tumours. METHODS: A retrospective, case note study was conducted between 1990 and 2000 in four Sydney teaching hospitals. The data collected included clinical features, investigations and tumour characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six people with small bowel tumours were identified (91 malignant; 75 benign). Malignant tumours consisted of adenocarcinomas (31%), carcinoid tumours (12%), lymphomas (7%) and leiomyosarcomas (5%). Benign tumours consisted of adenomas (22%), hamartomas (13%), leiomyomas (4%), inflammatory polyps (4%) and hyperplastic polyps (2%) and a benign schwannoma (1%). Adenocarcinomas were mainly located in the duodenum (P < 0.001) and carcinoid tumours in the ileum (P < 0.001). Malignant tumours were associated with a higher proportion of symptoms (P < 0.01), signs (P < 0.001) and episodes of small bowel obstruction (P < 0.01). Abdominal CT scans demonstrated a greater sensitivity (87.7%) than SBS (72.9%) with a slightly improved sensitivity when both investigations were used (89.3%). Abdominal ultrasound had a lower sensitivity than both of the above investigations of 65%. Gastroduodenoscopy had a sensitivity of 90% for diagnosing duodenal tumours. Operative procedures were performed on 92 patients with a preoperative diagnosis made in 77%. Metastatic spread of malignant tumours was evident in 46%. The sites of spread were to lymph nodes (23%), liver (21%) and distant locations (2%) at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS:Malignant small bowel tumours are more likely to produce symptoms and signs than benign tumours, particularly caused by small bowel obstruction. Abdominal CT is the best radiological investigation for small bowel tumours and has a slight complimentary effect with SBS in improving the chances of detection. Gastroduodenoscopy remains the best investigation of duodenal tumours.