Comparison of a direct fecal Shiga-like toxin assay and sorbitol-MacConkey agar culture for laboratory diagnosis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection.

A direct fecal Shiga-like toxin assay (DSLTA) was used to prospectively screen 9,449 unselected stool samples, received at the British Columbia Provincial Health Laboratories and the Metropolitan Laboratories of Vancouver, for Shiga-like toxin I and Shiga-like toxin II. The results were compared with results of routine stool culture on sorbitol-MacConkey agar (SMAC) for Escherichia coli O157:H7. Of 80 specimens positive by either method, 59 (74%) and 74 (93%) were positive by SMAC and DSLTA, respectively; 53 (66%) were positive by both methods, 21 (26%) were positive by DSLTA only, and 6 (7%) were positive by SMAC only. On further screening, Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli were detected in 8 (38%) of the 21 stools positive by DSLTA only, including serotypes O157:H7 (1 stool), O26:K60 (5 stools), O128:K67 (1 stool), and O103:H2 (1 stool). For the remaining 13 stools in which no SLTEC was found but DSLTA was positive, clinical information revealed that 11 of 12 patients had diarrheal illnesses, and 4 of these 11 had bloody diarrhea or hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Stools positive only by SMAC were collected earlier in the illness than stools positive by DSLTA, suggesting that free fecal toxin levels may be too low to detect at this time. Overall we found that DSLTA detected 19% more positive specimens than SMAC and that Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli serotypes other than E. coli O157:H7 are causing disease in the province of British Columbia, Canada.