| Literature DB >> 15378421 |
Atsunori Yoshino1, Masataka Honda, Masahiro Ikeda, Satoko Tsuchida, Hiroshi Hataya, Satoru Sakazume, Yuriko Tanaka, Seiichiro Shishido, Hideo Nakai.
Abstract
Catheter replacement and cuff-shaving are per-formed as a surgical treatment against tunnel infection(TI) in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. The efficacy of catheter replacement is well established, but that of cuff-shaving is not. For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of cuff-shaving, we compared the time interval between each procedure and subsequent TI. In order to perform this comparison, we reviewed data from 32 cuff-shaving procedures and 29 catheter replacement procedures at Tokyo Metropolitan Kiyose Children's Hospital in the period from 1 March 1991 to 1 May 2001, retrospectively. There was no significant difference in the time interval between each procedure and subsequent TI(P=0.284). The incidence of recurrence was no more than 12.5% for the cuff-shaving procedures. The incidence of peritonitis due to post-surgery TI with the cuff-shaving procedures was 9.3% and 6.8% with the replacement procedure (P=0.725). There was no significant variation in time interval to post-cuff-shaving TI according to the reason for the cuff-shaving procedure. In conclusion,cuff-shaving may be worth considering for TI in adequately selected patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15378421 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-004-1621-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Nephrol ISSN: 0931-041X Impact factor: 3.714