AIMS: To illustrate the contribution of smoothing methods to modelling exposure-response data, Cox models with penalised splines were used to reanalyse lung cancer risk in a cohort of workers exposed to silica in California's diatomaceous earth industry. To encourage application of this approach, computer code is provided. METHODS: Relying on graphic plots of hazard ratios as smooth functions of exposure, the sensitivity of the curve to amount of smoothing, length of the exposure lag, and the influence of the highest exposures was evaluated. Trimming and data transformations were used to down-weight influential observations. RESULTS: The estimated hazard ratio increased steeply with cumulative silica exposure before flattening and then declining over the sparser regions of exposure. The curve was sensitive to changes in degrees of freedom, but insensitive to the number or location of knots. As the length of lag increased, so did the maximum hazard ratio, but the shape was similar. Deleting the two highest exposed subjects eliminated the top half of the range and allowed the hazard ratio to continue to rise. The shape of the splines suggested a parametric model with log hazard as a linear function of log transformed exposure would fit well. CONCLUSIONS: This flexible statistical approach reduces the dependence on a priori assumptions, while pointing to a suitable parametric model if one exists. In the absence of an appropriate parametric form, however, splines can provide exposure-response information useful for aetiological research and public health intervention.
AIMS: To illustrate the contribution of smoothing methods to modelling exposure-response data, Cox models with penalised splines were used to reanalyse lung cancer risk in a cohort of workers exposed to silica in California's diatomaceous earth industry. To encourage application of this approach, computer code is provided. METHODS: Relying on graphic plots of hazard ratios as smooth functions of exposure, the sensitivity of the curve to amount of smoothing, length of the exposure lag, and the influence of the highest exposures was evaluated. Trimming and data transformations were used to down-weight influential observations. RESULTS: The estimated hazard ratio increased steeply with cumulative silica exposure before flattening and then declining over the sparser regions of exposure. The curve was sensitive to changes in degrees of freedom, but insensitive to the number or location of knots. As the length of lag increased, so did the maximum hazard ratio, but the shape was similar. Deleting the two highest exposed subjects eliminated the top half of the range and allowed the hazard ratio to continue to rise. The shape of the splines suggested a parametric model with log hazard as a linear function of log transformed exposure would fit well. CONCLUSIONS: This flexible statistical approach reduces the dependence on a priori assumptions, while pointing to a suitable parametric model if one exists. In the absence of an appropriate parametric form, however, splines can provide exposure-response information useful for aetiological research and public health intervention.
Authors: Frank C Curriero; Karlyn S Heiner; Jonathan M Samet; Scott L Zeger; Lisa Strug; Jonathan A Patz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Philip S Rosenberg; Hormuzd Katki; Christine A Swanson; Linda M Brown; Sholom Wacholder; Robert N Hoover Journal: Stat Med Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Leslie Stayner; Kyle Steenland; Mustafa Dosemeci; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Chang Wook Jeong; Jong Jin Oh; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ilir Agalliu; Sadie Costello; Katie M Applebaum; Roberta M Ray; George Astrakianakis; Dao Li Gao; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins; Charles A Herzog; Areef Ishani; Philip A Kalra Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 10.121