Literature DB >> 15377645

Muscle blood flow response to contraction: influence of venous pressure.

Zoran Valic1, John B Buckwalter, Philip S Clifford.   

Abstract

The skeletal muscle pump is thought to be at least partially responsible for the immediate muscle hyperemia seen with exercise. We hypothesized that increases in venous pressure within the muscle would enhance the effectiveness of the muscle pump and yield greater postcontraction hyperemia. In nine anesthetized beagle dogs, arterial inflow and venous outflow of a single hindlimb were measured with ultrasonic transit-time flow probes in response to 1-s tetanic contractions evoked by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve. Venous pressure in the hindlimb was manipulated by tilting the upright dogs to a 30 degrees angle in the head-up or head-down positions. The volume of venous blood expelled during contractions was 2.2 +/- 0.2, 1.6 +/- 0.2, and 1.4 +/- 0.2 ml with the head-up, horizontal, and head-down positions, respectively. Although altering hindlimb venous pressure influenced venous expulsion during contraction, the increase in arterial inflow was similar regardless of position. Moreover, the volume of blood expelled was a small fraction of the cumulative arterial volume after the contraction. These results suggest that the muscle pump is not a major contributor to the hyperemic response to skeletal muscle contraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377645     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00151.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  17 in total

1.  Acute impact of intermittent pneumatic leg compression frequency on limb hemodynamics, vascular function, and skeletal muscle gene expression in humans.

Authors:  Ryan D Sheldon; Bruno T Roseguini; John P Thyfault; Brett D Crist; M H Laughlin; Sean C Newcomer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-03-22

2.  Temporal profile of rat skeletal muscle capillary haemodynamics during recovery from contractions.

Authors:  Leonardo F Ferreira; Danielle J Padilla; Timothy I Musch; David C Poole
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Effects of dynamic and static handgrip exercises on hand and wrist volume.

Authors:  Junichiro Yamauchi; Alan Hargens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of pedal frequency on estimated muscle microvascular O2 extraction.

Authors:  Leonardo F Ferreira; Barbara J Lutjemeier; Dana K Townsend; Thomas J Barstow
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Positional differences in reactive hyperemia provide insight into initial phase of exercise hyperemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jasperse; J Kevin Shoemaker; Eric J Gray; Philip S Clifford
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Comparison of morphological changes of muscle fibers in response to dynamic electrical muscle contraction and dynamic hydraulic stimulation in a rat hindlimb disuse model.

Authors:  M Hu; H Lam; R Yeh; M Teeratananon; Y-X Qin
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.881

7.  Alteration of contraction-to-rest ratio to optimize trabecular bone adaptation induced by dynamic muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Hoyan Lam; Minyi Hu; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Intramedullary pressure and matrix strain induced by oscillatory skeletal muscle stimulation and its potential in adaptation.

Authors:  Yi-Xian Qin; Hoyan Lam
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical compression elicits vasodilatation in rat skeletal muscle feed arteries.

Authors:  Philip S Clifford; Heidi A Kluess; Jason J Hamann; John B Buckwalter; Jeffrey L Jasperse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Dynamic hydraulic fluid stimulation regulated intramedullary pressure.

Authors:  Minyi Hu; Frederick Serra-Hsu; Neville Bethel; Liangjun Lin; Suzanne Ferreri; Jiqi Cheng; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.