Literature DB >> 15377523

A study of age-related architectural changes that are most damaging to bones.

Yan Song1, Michael A K Liebschner, Gemunu H Gunaratne.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis-related bone damage causes major socioeconomic problems. For efficient use of therapeutic agents, it is necessary to be able to reliably identify patients with high propensity for nontraumatic fracture. Age-related bone loss imposes several architectural changes in bone; one of the few ways to estimate damage due to individual changes, and hence determine the most serious types of damage, is via the analysis of suitable mathematical models. Anatomical sites such as the vertebral body, proximal femur, and distal radius are locations where most age-related fractures occur. The inner porous (or trabecular) bone from these sites, which resemble disordered cubic networks, play a significant role in load transmission at these sites. Analysis of a mathematical model of porous bone is used to show that perforation of elements of the network is the most damaging architectural change to a bone. We also show that an expression for bone strength, derived on this basis, can capture changes in strength caused by the inclusion of other features like thinning of trabecular bone and the anisotropy of the network. We finally argue that bone density, which is currently the most routinely used diagnostic, cannot be a reliable surrogate for bone strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377523      PMCID: PMC1304878          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.044511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  29 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for hip fracture not related to bone mass and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B Allolio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Computer simulation of trabecular remodeling using a simplified structural model.

Authors:  S Tayyar; P S Weinhold; R A Butler; J C Woodard; L D Zardiackas; K R St John; J M Bledsoe; J A Gilbert
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Breaking down bone strength: a perspective on the future of skeletal genetics.

Authors:  R D Blank
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: a three-dimensional model simulation.

Authors:  X E Guo; C H Kim
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing.

Authors:  E N Ebbesen; J S Thomsen; H Beck-Nielsen; H J Nepper-Rasmussen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 7.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; C M Ford; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis.

Authors:  G H Bell; O Dunbar; J S Beck; A Gibb
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1967

Review 10.  Comments on the hypotheses underlying fracture risk assessment in osteoporosis as proposed by the World Health Organization.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  4 in total

1.  Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Ralph Müller; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Chamith S Rajapakse; Gemunu H Gunaratne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Factors predicting late collapse of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Neritan Myderrizi
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2011-11

3.  New Horizons for Hydroxyapatite Supported by DXA Assessment-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Cezary Grochowski; Andrzej Rysak; Marek Mazurek; Tomasz Blicharski; Piotr Kamieniak; Piotr Wolszczak; Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah; Grzegorz Litak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Nanohydroxyapatite application to osteoporosis management.

Authors:  Zairin Noor
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2013-10-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.