Literature DB >> 15377239

Breast cancer in Western Australia: clinical practice and clinical guidelines.

Suzanne P McEvoy1, David M Ingram, Michael J Byrne, David J Joseph, Joanna Dewar, James Trotter, Chris Harper, Claire Haworth, Jennett M Harvey, Greg F Sterrett, Konrad Jamrozik, Lin Fritschi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review changes in patterns of care for women with early invasive breast cancer in Western Australia from 1989 to 1999, and compare management with recommendations in the 1995 National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Population-based surveys of all cases listed in the Western Australian Cancer Registry and Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Data System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Congruence of care with guidelines.
RESULTS: Data were available for 1649 women with early invasive breast cancer (categories pT1or pT2; pN0 or pN1; and M0). In 1999, 96% had a preoperative diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration or core biopsy (compared with 66% in 1989), with a synoptic pathology report on 95%. Breast-conserving surgery was used for 66% of women with mammographically detected tumours (v 35% in 1989) and 46% of those with clinically detected tumours (v 28% in 1989), with radiotherapy to the conserved breast in 90% of these cases (83% in 1989). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 92% of premenopausal women with node-positive disease and 63% with poor-prognosis node-negative tumours (v 78% and 14%, respectively, in 1989). Among postmenopausal women with receptor-positive tumours, tamoxifen was prescribed for 91% of those with positive nodes (85% in 1989) and 79% of those with negative nodes (30% in 1989). Among postmenopausal women with receptor-negative tumours, chemotherapy was prescribed for 70% with positive nodes (v 33%) and 58% with negative nodes (v none).
CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of management of women with early invasive breast cancer in Western Australia during the 1990s changed significantly in all respects toward those recommended in the 1995 guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377239     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Canadian breast cancer guidelines: have they made a difference?

Authors:  Steven Latosinsky; Katherine Fradette; Lisa Lix; Karen Hildebrand; Donna Turner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Pregnancy after breast cancer: population based study.

Authors:  Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Max Bulsara; James Semmens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-08

3.  Breast cancer care compared with clinical Guidelines: an observational study in France.

Authors:  Marie Lebeau; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Carine Bellera; Christine Tunon-de-Lara; Alain Daban; Francis Lipinski; Dominique Jaubert; Pierre Ingrand; Virginie Migeot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The adherence paradox: guideline deviations contribute to the increased 5-year survival of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Ute S Albert; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Assessment of Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Associated With Mammographic Screening and Adjuvant Therapy From 1986 to 2013 in the State of Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Robert Burton; Christopher Stevenson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 6.  The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caro E Sluijter; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Iris D Nagtegaal; Lucy I H Overbeek
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.