Literature DB >> 15376684

Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels.

Gautam K Vallabha1, Betty Tuller.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that speakers are systematically inaccurate, or biased, when imitating self-produced vowels. The direction of these biases in formant space and their variation may offer clues about the organization of the vowel perceptual space. To examine these patterns, three male speakers were asked to imitate 45 self-produced vowels that were systematically distributed in F1/F2 space. All three speakers showed imitation bias, and the bias magnitudes were significantly larger than those predicted by a model of articulatory noise. Each speaker showed a different pattern of bias directions, but the pattern was unrelated to the locations of prototypical vowels produced by that speaker. However, there were substantial quantitative regularities: (1) The distribution of imitation variability and bias magnitudes were similar for all speakers, (2) the imitation variability was independent of the bias magnitudes, and (3) the imitation variability (a production measure) was commensurate with the formant discrimination limen (a perceptual measure). These results indicate that there is additive Gaussian noise in the imitation process that independently affects each formant and that there are speaker-dependent and potentially nonlinguistic biases in vowel perception and production.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376684     DOI: 10.1121/1.1764832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Syncing Up for a Good Conversation: A Clinically Meaningful Methodology for Capturing Conversational Entrainment in the Speech Domain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Megan M Willi; Visar Berisha
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

4.  Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Gautam K Vallabha; James L McClelland; Ferran Pons; Janet F Werker; Shigeaki Amano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production.

Authors:  Jennifer S Pardo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-27

6.  Neural correlates of phonetic convergence and speech imitation.

Authors:  Maëva Garnier; Laurent Lamalle; Marc Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-11

7.  Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?

Authors:  Molly Babel; Michael McAuliffe; Graham Haber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-24

8.  Comparison of native and non-native phone imitation by English and Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Anne J Olmstead; Navin Viswanathan; M Pilar Aivar; Sarath Manuel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.