Literature DB >> 15376404

Birthing positions. A qualitative study into the views of women about various birthing positions.

A De Jonge1, A L M Lagro-Janssen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gain insight into the influences on women's use of birthing positions, and into the labor experiences of women in relation to the birthing positions they used. Quantitative studies have shown some medical advantages of non-supine birthing positions. They also suggested some psychological benefits but these are difficult to interpret. In this study in-depth interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between birthing positions and the labor experience. We found that the advice given by midwives was the most important factor influencing the choice of birthing positions. If medically possible, women benefited from having the autonomy to find the positions that were most useful to them. Their choices varied greatly, as did their experience of pain in relation to the type of position. Women, regardless of ethnicity, were most familiar with the supine position but valued practical information on other options. In conclusion, because the supine position is dominant in westernized societies, midwives have an important role to play in widening the range of women's choices. Midwives should empower women to find the positions that are most suitable for them, by giving practical advice during pregnancy and labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376404     DOI: 10.1080/01674820410001737432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  6 in total

1.  The role of maternity care providers in promoting shared decision making regarding birthing positions during the second stage of labor.

Authors:  Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Lisa Kane Low; Irene Korstjens; Toine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Women's choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Stefania Di Gangi; Marco Noventa; Veronica Bacile; Alessandra Zambon; Giovanni Battista Nardelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Perineal injuries and birth positions among 2992 women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth.

Authors:  Malin Edqvist; Ellen Blix; Hanne K Hegaard; Olöf Ásta Ólafsdottir; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Karen Ingversen; Margareta Mollberg; Helena Lindgren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.

Authors:  M J M H Lombarts; I Rupp; P Vallejo; R Suñol; N S Klazinga
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

5.  The perception of primiparous mothers of comfortable resources in labor pain (a qualitative study).

Authors:  Tahereh Boryri; Noor Mohammad Noori; Alireza Teimouri; Fariba Yaghobinia
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2016 May-Jun

6.  Exploring the perspective of nursing staff or caregivers on birthing positions in Central India.

Authors:  Anita Yadav; Anusha Kamath; Shuchita Mundle; Jyoti Baghel; Charu Sharma; Avinash Prakash
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.