Literature DB >> 15376245

Differences in lethality between cancer cells and human lymphocytes caused by LF-electromagnetic fields.

Maria Radeva1, Hermann Berg.   

Abstract

The lethal response of cultured cancer cells lines K-562, U-937, DG-75, and HL-60 were measured directly after a 4 h exposure to a pulsating electromagnetic field (PEMF, sinusoidal wave form, 35 mT peak, 50 Hz) [Traitcheva et al. (2003): Bioelectromagnetics 24:148-158] and 24 h later, to determine the post-exposure effect. The results were found to depend on the medium, pH value, conductivity, and temperature. From these experiments, suitable conditions were chosen to compare the vitality between K-562 cells and normal human lymphocytes after PEMF treatment and photodynamic action. Both agents enhance necrosis synergistically for diseased as well as for healthy cells, but the lymphocytes are more resistant. The efficacy of PEMF on the destruction of cancer cells is further increased by heating (hyperthermia) of the suspension up to 44 degrees C or by lowering the pH-value (hyperacidity) to pH 6.4. Similar apoptosis and necrosis can be obtained using moderate magnetic fields (B < or = 15 mT 50/60 Hz), but this requires longer treatment of at least over a week. PEMF application combined with anticancer drugs and photodynamic therapy will be very effective. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376245     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  7 in total

Review 1.  "Quantum Leap" in Photobiomodulation Therapy Ushers in a New Generation of Light-Based Treatments for Cancer and Other Complex Diseases: Perspective and Mini-Review.

Authors:  Luis Santana-Blank; Elizabeth Rodríguez-Santana; Karin E Santana-Rodríguez; Heberto Reyes
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  The anti-tumor effect of A3 adenosine receptors is potentiated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultured neural cancer cells.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vincenzi; Martina Targa; Carmen Corciulo; Stefania Gessi; Stefania Merighi; Stefania Setti; Ruggero Cadossi; Pier Andrea Borea; Katia Varani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Maria Vadalà; Julio Cesar Morales-Medina; Annamaria Vallelunga; Beniamino Palmieri; Carmen Laurino; Tommaso Iannitti
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Progressive Study on the Non-thermal Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy in Oncology.

Authors:  Aoshu Xu; Qian Wang; Xin Lv; Tingting Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  In Vitro and in Vivo Study of the Effect of Osteogenic Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Breast and Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Mike Y Chen; Jing Li; Nianli Zhang; Erik I Waldorff; James T Ryaby; Philip Fedor; Yongsheng Jia; Yujun Wang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

6.  Low intensity and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields selectively impair breast cancer cell viability.

Authors:  Sara Crocetti; Christian Beyer; Grit Schade; Marcel Egli; Jürg Fröhlich; Alfredo Franco-Obregón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The effect of extremely low-frequency magnetic field (50-60 Hz) exposure on spontaneous apoptosis: The results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahsa Mansourian; Hamid Reza Marateb; Golnaz Vaseghi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-08-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.