Literature DB >> 15374941

Ultraviolet B but not ultraviolet A radiation initiates melanoma.

Edward C De Fabo1, Frances P Noonan, Thomas Fears, Glenn Merlino.   

Abstract

Cutaneous malignant melanoma is one of the fastest increasing cancers with an incidence that has more than doubled in the last 25 years. Sunlight exposure is strongly implicated in the etiology of cutaneous malignant melanoma and the UV portion of the sunlight spectrum is considered responsible. Data are, however, conflicting on the roles of ultraviolet B [UVB; 280-320 nanometers (nm)] and ultraviolet A (UVA; 320-400 nm), which differ in their ability to initiate DNA damage, cell signaling pathways and immune alterations. To address this issue, we have used specialized optical sources, emitting isolated or combined UVB or UVA wavebands or solar simulating radiation, together with our hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-transgenic mouse model of UV-induced melanoma that uniquely recapitulates human disease. Only UVB-containing sources initiated melanoma. These were the isolated UVB waveband (>96% 280-320 nm), the unfiltered F40 sunlamp (250-800 nm) and the solar simulator (290-800 nm). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that the isolated UVB waveband was more effective in initiating melanoma than either the F40 sunlamp or the solar simulator (modified log rank P < 0.02). The latter two sources showed similar melanoma effectiveness (P = 0.38). In contrast, transgenic mice irradiated with either the isolated UVA waveband (>99.9% 320-400 nm, 150 kJ/m2), or an F40 sunlamp filtered to remove > 96% of the UVB, responded like unirradiated control animals. We conclude that, within the constraints of this animal model, UVB is responsible for the induction of mammalian cutaneous malignant melanoma whereas UVA is ineffective even at doses considered physiologically relevant. This finding may have major implications with respect both to risk assessment from exposure to solar and artificial UVB, and to development of effective protection strategies against melanoma induction by UVB. Moreover, these differences in wavelength effectiveness can now be exploited to identify UV pathways relevant to melanomagenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15374941     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  56 in total

1.  The deceptive nature of UVA tanning versus the modest protective effects of UVB tanning on human skin.

Authors:  Yoshinori Miyamura; Sergio G Coelho; Kathrin Schlenz; Jan Batzer; Christoph Smuda; Wonseon Choi; Michaela Brenner; Thierry Passeron; Guofeng Zhang; Ludger Kolbe; Rainer Wolber; Vincent J Hearing
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.693

2.  Non-thermal nanoelectroablation of UV-induced murine melanomas stimulates an immune response.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Kevin Tran; Kaying Lui; Joanne Huynh; Brian Athos; Mark Kreis; Pamela Nuccitelli; Edward C De Fabo
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.693

Review 3.  Stratospheric ozone depletion.

Authors:  F Sherwood Rowland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Prospective study of ultraviolet radiation exposure and risk of cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Shih-Wen Lin; David C Wheeler; Yikyung Park; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Albert R Hollenbeck; D Michal Freedman; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  [The role of ultraviolet irradiation in malignant melanoma].

Authors:  C Berking
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  UVA tanning is involved in the increased incidence of skin cancers in fair-skinned young women.

Authors:  Sergio G Coelho; Vincent J Hearing
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.693

7.  UV causation of melanoma in Xiphophorus is dominated by melanin photosensitized oxidant production.

Authors:  Simon R Wood; Marianne Berwick; Ronald D Ley; Ronald B Walter; Richard B Setlow; Graham S Timmins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Genetic and environmental melanoma models in fish.

Authors:  E Elizabeth Patton; David L Mitchell; Rodney S Nairn
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.693

Review 9.  Main roads to melanoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Palmieri; Mariaelena Capone; Maria Libera Ascierto; Giusy Gentilcore; David F Stroncek; Milena Casula; Maria Cristina Sini; Marco Palla; Nicola Mozzillo; Paolo A Ascierto
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Emerging roles of PAR-1 and PAFR in melanoma metastasis.

Authors:  Vladislava O Melnikova; Gabriel J Villares; Menashe Bar-Eli
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2008-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.