Literature DB >> 15374773

Design and baseline characteristics of the Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering study.

Terje R Pedersen1, Ole Faergeman, John J P Kastelein, Anders G Olsson, Matti J Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Gary Palmer.   

Abstract

The Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) study is an investigator-initiated trial designed to determine whether additional clinical benefit might be gained through a strategy that decreases levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels better than those currently achieved with established statin therapy in patients who have coronary heart disease. IDEAL is a multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, end point classification study. Patients who had myocardial infarction were randomized to prescription treatment with 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or 20 mg/day of simvastatin (the dose was increased to 40 mg/day at week 24 in those patients whose plasma total cholesterol remained >5.0 mmol/L, or 190 mg/dl, or whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained >3.0 mmol/L, or 115 mg/dl). The primary clinical outcome variable is the time to initial occurrence of a major coronary event, which is defined as nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, coronary death, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The study is designed to have a power of 90% to detect a relative decrease of 20% in the atorvastatin-group compared with the simvastatin-group in the number of major events caused by coronary heart disease over approximately 5.5 years. The 8,888 randomized patients had the following characteristics: mean age 61.7 +/- 9.5 years, 19.1% women (mean age 64.0 +/- 9.5 years), baseline total cholesterol 5.1 +/- 1.0 mmol/L (197 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.2 +/- 0.9 mmol/L (124 mg/dl), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (46 mg/dl). Drug treatment before randomization consisted of statins in 77% of patients, aspirin in 78.9%, beta blockers in 75.1%, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in 30%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15374773     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Adverse effects of statins : how should cardiologists and general physicians manage them in clinical practice?

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Valentina Francione; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Results of new statin trials: should the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment guidelines be revised?

Authors:  Allison M J Ross; Theodore G Ganiats
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  PROVE-IT proved it: lower is better--pro.

Authors:  Lawrence A Leiter
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Genetic meta-analysis of cancer diagnosis following statin use identifies new associations and implicates human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in women.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Tardif; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Maxine Sun; Audrey Lemaçon; Marc-André Legault; Géraldine Asselin; Sylvie Provost; Hugues Aschard; Amina Barhdadi; Yassamin Feroz Zada; Diane Valois; Ian Mongrain
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Baseline diabetes as a way to predict CV outcomes in a lipid-modifying trial: a meta-analysis of 330,376 patients from 47 landmark studies.

Authors:  Michel P Hermans; Evariste Bouenizabila; Daniel K Amoussou-Guenou; Sylvie A Ahn; Michel F Rousseau
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.951

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.