Literature DB >> 15374536

MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Juanita Crook1, Michael McLean, Ivan Yeung, Theresa Williams, Gina Lockwood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quality assurance through postplan assessment is an integral part of permanent seed prostate implants. The use of MRI-CT fusion for 1-month postimplant dosimetry permits accurate assessment of prostate volume without seed induced artifact and uncertainties of prostate contour inherent to CT assessments. Routine use of MRI-CT fusion reveals significant prostate edema may persist several weeks. This study evaluates the effect of edema, and its subsequent resolution, on dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 2001 to June 2003, 241 men were treated with (125)I seed implants based on a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) preplan. Quality assessment was performed at 1 month by CT-MRI fusion using VariSeed software. Over this 24-month period, 29 patients (12%) with residual edema at 1 month (12-60% >TRUS plan volume), had repeat CT-MRI fusion at 2-4 months to reassess volume and dosimetry. Eleven of the 29 had received prior androgen ablation to shrink the prostate preimplant.
RESULTS: For the entire group (n = 241), mean preimplant prostate volume was 33.7 cc and median postplan dosimetric parameters were: V100, 92.2%; D90, 153 Gy; and V150, 53%. For the 29 patients with prolonged edema, mean preimplant volume was 34.8 cc and 1-month volume was 46.1 cc (p <0.001). Mean volume reduction between 1 and 2 months was 13%. The decrease in prostate volume had a significant effect on dosimetry with median increase between 1 month and 2 months in calculated V100 of 9.5%, V150 22.6%, V200 30.1%, and D90 11.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant residual edema is seen 1-month postimplant in 12% of prostates and may have a profound effect on dosimetry. Further study is underway to characterize the time course of resolution of the edema, and to perform integral dosimetry based on the changing volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15374536     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2004.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  20 in total

1.  Preimplant factors affecting postimplant CT-determined prostate volume and the CT/TRUS volume ratio after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with 125I free seeds.

Authors:  Akitomo Sugawara; Jun Nakashima; Etsuo Kunieda; Hirohiko Nagata; Hirotaka Asakura; Mototsugu Oya; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging across the prostate brachytherapy workflow.

Authors:  P Blanchard; C Ménard; S J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Fusion imaging: a bipartite approach.

Authors:  Aravinda Konidena; Samridhi Shekhar; Avani Dixit; Deepa Jatti Patil; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant magnetic resonance imaging dosimetry using positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging markers.

Authors:  Geoffrey V Martin; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jihong Wang; Teresa L Bruno; Tharakeswara Bathala; Pierre Blanchard; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Pulse sequence considerations for simulation and postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma; Marinus A Moerland; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Rajat J Kudchadker; Kristy K Brock; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alter prostate size? Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients undergoing IMRT alone.

Authors:  Hidekazu Tanaka; Takahiro Yamaguchi; Kae Hachiya; Masahide Hayashi; Shinichi Ogawa; Hironori Nishibori; Shingo Kamei; Satoshi Ishihara; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-09-19

8.  Shape analysis of the prostate: establishing imaging specifications for the design of a transurethral imaging device for prostate brachytherapy guidance.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Brian J Davis; Christopher C Goulet; Torrence M Wilson; Lance A Mynderse; Keith M Furutani; Jon J Camp; Richard A Robb
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Permanent seed implant brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: Preoperative planning with 145 Gy versus real-time intraoperative planning with 160 Gy.

Authors:  Olga Pons-Llanas; Susana Roldan-Ortega; Francisco Celada-Alvarez; María José Perez-Calatayud; Victoria Fornes-Ferrer; Alejandro Tormo-Micó; José Perez-Calatayud; José Luis López-Torrecilla
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-26

10.  Fully Balanced SSFP Without an Endorectal Coil for Postimplant QA of MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Sanders; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Chad A Levitt; Tharakeswara Bathala; Rajat J Kudchadker; Chad Tang; Teresa L Bruno; Christine Starks; Edwin Santiago; Michelle Wells; Carl P Weaver; Jingfei Ma; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.