Literature DB >> 15373847

Poor correlation between stated and found concentrations of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (4,4'-MDI) in petrolatum patch-test preparations.

Malin Frick1, Erik Zimerson, Daniel Karlsson, Asa Marand, Gunnar Skarping, Marléne Isaksson, Magnus Bruze.   

Abstract

Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) is widely used in its polymeric form in the manufacturing of polyurethane products. Previous reports on MDI-related contact allergy have shown a pattern, where patients seem to react to their own MDI-based work material but not to commercial patch-test preparations, which contain 4,4'-MDI. Therefore, we performed chemical analyses of 14 commercial test preparations of 4,4'-MDI obtained from 8 European and 4 American dermatology departments as well as 2 preparations from 2 major European suppliers of patch-test allergens. A new method for monitoring 4,4'-MDI in petrolatum preparations was developed and the determination of 4,4'-MDI as the MDI-dibutylamine derivative using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was performed. None of the preparations obtained from the dermatology departments contained more than 12% of the concentration stated on the label. In most cases, 4,4'-MDI content was only a few percentages or less of the concentration stated. 7 of the 14 preparations were analysed before the expiry date. Yet, only 1 of them, a preparation directly obtained from the supplier, came close to the concentration stated on the label. Thus, using these preparations, patients will be tested with a lower concentration than intended, leading to possible false-negative reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15373847     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00404.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Allergological diagnostics and current allergens in occupational dermatology].

Authors:  J Geier; A Krautheim; H Lessmann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Vapor Pressure and Predicted Stability of American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergens.

Authors:  Paul C Jou; Paul D Siegel; Erin M Warshaw
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Concentrations and stability of methyl methacrylate, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and nickel sulfate in commercial patch test allergen preparations.

Authors:  Paul D Siegel; Joseph F Fowler; Brandon F Law; Erin M Warshaw; James S Taylor
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Skin exposure to isocyanates: reasons for concern.

Authors:  Dhimiter Bello; Christina A Herrick; Thomas J Smith; Susan R Woskie; Robert P Streicher; Mark R Cullen; Youcheng Liu; Carrie A Redlich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Sensitization and cross-reactivity patterns of contact allergy to diisocyanates and corresponding amines: investigation of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, diphenylmethane-4,4'-diamine, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, and dicylohexylmethane-4,4'-diamine.

Authors:  Haneen Hamada; Magnus Bruze; Erik Zimerson; Marléne Isaksson; Malin Engfeldt
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Occupational contact allergy in bricklayers, tile setters etc. - Current spectrum of sensitization and recent time trends.

Authors:  J Geier; H Lessmann; C Skudlik; B K Ballmer-Weber; E Weisshaar; W Uter; A Schnuch
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.