Literature DB >> 15372372

[Catecholamine therapy in cardiogenic shock: helpful, useless or dangerous?].

H Schwertz1, U Müller-Werdan, R Prondzinsky, K Werdan, M Buerke.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by inadequate organ and tissue perfusion, due to cardiac dysfunction, predominantly following acute myocardial infarction. Mortality rates for patients with cardiogenic shock remain high, ranging from 50-70 % despite effective therapy. Rapid diagnostics, aggressive therapeutic approach (invasive or surgical revascularisation) and pharmacological support are currently used to improve the clinical outcome and survival. In the first line commonly sympathomimetics like dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine and norepinephrine are used for the pharmacological treatment. They have a high affinity for alpha- and beta adrenergic receptors, leading to a positive inotropic cardiac function, an increase in heart rate, oxygen enhanced demand, and an increase in vasoconstriction. However, there are also some disadvantages in the use of sympathomimetics in patients with cardiogenic shock. Clearly, metabolic acidosis due to the increased oxygen demand can be observed. Vasoconstriction induced by sympathomimetics can lead to perfusion mismatch or even deficit within the microcirculation. Additionally, in some studies which give evidence that the use of sympathomimetics can directly lead to enhanced systemic inflammatory response due to an increased IL-6 expression. However, sympathomimetics are still first line therapeutics for treatment of cardiogenic shock -- with respect to dosage and duration of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15372372     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-831364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  8 in total

1.  [More negative than positive effects: adrenaline for cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI: APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute-Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II.

Authors:  P Kellner; R Prondzinsky; L Pallmann; S Siegmann; S Unverzagt; H Lemm; S Dietz; J Soukup; K Werdan; M Buerke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  [Modern drug therapy in cardiovascular intensive care medicine].

Authors:  H Lemm; S Dietz; M Janusch; M Buerke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  [Catecholamines: pro and contra].

Authors:  R Riessen; O Tschritter; U Janssens; M Haap
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Prophylactic amiodarone and lidocaine improve survival in an ovine model of large size myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tieluo Li; Xufeng Wei; A Claire Watkins; Pablo G Sanchez; Zhongjun J Wu; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  [New pharmacological treatment approaches to cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  M Buerke; M Russ; K Werdan
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Hemodynamic variables and mortality in cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Torgersen; Christian A Schmittinger; Sarah Wagner; Hanno Ulmer; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob; Martin W Dünser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Early Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for 5-Fluorouracil-induced Acute Heart Failure with Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Robert Höllriegel; Julia Fischer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2014-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.