Literature DB >> 15371554

Improving specificity of DNA hybridization-based methods.

Tatyana Chalaya1, Elena Gogvadze, Anton Buzdin, Elena Kovalskaya, Eugene D Sverdlov.   

Abstract

Methods based on DNA reassociation in solution with the subsequent PCR amplification of certain hybrid molecules, such as coincidence cloning and subtractive hybridization, all suffer from a common imperfection: cross-hybridization between various types of paralogous repetitive DNA fragments. Although the situation can be slightly improved by the addition of repeat-specific competitor DNA into the hybridization mixture, the cross-hybridization outcome is a significant number of background chimeric clones in resulting DNA libraries. In order to overcome this challenge, we developed a technique called mispaired DNA rejection (MDR), which utilizes a treatment of resulting reassociated DNA with mismatch-specific nucleases. We examined the MDR efficiency using cross-hybridization of complex, whole genomic mixtures derived from human and chimpanzee genomes, digested with frequent-cutter restriction enzyme. We show here that both single-stranded DNA-specific and mismatched double-stranded DNA-specific nucleases can be used for MDR separately or in combination, reducing the background level from 60 to 4% or lower. The technique presented here is of universal usefulness and can be applied to both cDNA and genomic DNA subtractions of very complex DNA mixtures. MDR is also useful for the genome-wide recovery of highly conserved DNA sequences, as we demonstrate by comparing human and pygmy marmoset genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371554      PMCID: PMC519126          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  17 in total

1.  High polymorphism level of genomic sequences flanking insertion sites of human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeats.

Authors:  I Lavrentieva; N E Broude; Y Lebedev; I I Gottesman; S A Lukyanov; C L Smith; E D Sverdlov
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  CEL I enzymatic mutation detection assay.

Authors:  J Kulinski; D Besack; C A Oleykowski; A K Godwin; A T Yeung
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  Retroviruses and primate evolution.

Authors:  E D Sverdlov
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Mismatch cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases.

Authors:  Bradley J Till; Chris Burtner; Luca Comai; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Overexpression of interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 in the liver of patients with type I autoimmune hepatitis identified by suppression subtractive hybridization.

Authors:  K Nagayama; N Enomoto; Y Miyasaka; M Kurosaki; C H Chen; N Sakamoto; M Nakagawa; C Sato; J Tazawa; T Ikeda; N Izumi; M Watanabe
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Representational difference analysis in detection of genetic lesions in cancer.

Authors:  N Lisitsyn; M Wigler
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Highly efficient method for obtaining a subtracted genomic DNA library by the modified in-gel competitive reassociation method.

Authors:  H Sasaki; S Nomura; N Akiyama; A Takahashi; T Sugimura; M Oishi; M Terada
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  An endonuclease/ligase based mutation scanning method especially suited for analysis of neoplastic tissue.

Authors:  Jianmin Huang; Brian Kirk; Reyna Favis; Thierry Soussi; Philip Paty; Weiguo Cao; Francis Barany
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Binding of the baculovirus very late expression factor 1 (VLF-1) to different DNA structures.

Authors:  Victor S Mikhailov; George F Rohrmann
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 2.946

View more
  4 in total

1.  Data aggregation at the level of molecular pathways improves stability of experimental transcriptomic and proteomic data.

Authors:  Nicolas Borisov; Maria Suntsova; Maxim Sorokin; Andrew Garazha; Olga Kovalchuk; Alexander Aliper; Elena Ilnitskaya; Ksenia Lezhnina; Mikhail Korzinkin; Victor Tkachev; Vyacheslav Saenko; Yury Saenko; Dmitry G Sokov; Nurshat M Gaifullin; Kirill Kashintsev; Valery Shirokorad; Irina Shabalina; Alex Zhavoronkov; Bhubaneswar Mishra; Charles R Cantor; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  GREM, a technique for genome-wide isolation and quantitative analysis of promoter active repeats.

Authors:  Anton Buzdin; Elena Kovalskaya-Alexandrova; Elena Gogvadze; Eugene Sverdlov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Rapid EST isolation from chromosome 1R of rye.

Authors:  Ruo-Nan Zhou; Rui Shi; Shu-Mei Jiang; Wei-Bo Yin; Huang-Huang Wang; Yu-Hong Chen; Jun Hu; Richard R C Wang; Xiang-Qi Zhang; Zan-Min Hu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  The OncoFinder algorithm for minimizing the errors introduced by the high-throughput methods of transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Anton A Buzdin; Alex A Zhavoronkov; Mikhail B Korzinkin; Sergey A Roumiantsev; Alexander M Aliper; Larisa S Venkova; Philip Y Smirnov; Nikolay M Borisov
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2014-08-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.