Literature DB >> 15371518

Rejection of false matches for binocular correspondence in macaque visual cortical area V4.

Seiji Tanabe1, Kazumasa Umeda, Ichiro Fujita.   

Abstract

A plane lying in depth is vividly perceived by viewing a random-dot stereogram (RDS) with a slight binocular disparity. Perception of a plane-in-depth is lost by reversing the contrast of dots seen by one of the eyes to generate an anticorrelated RDS. From a computational perspective, the visual system cannot find a globally consistent solution for matching the left and right eye images of an anticorrelated RDS. The neural representation of a global match should therefore be insensitive to binocular disparity in an anticorrelated RDS. Most neurons in the striate cortex (V1) respond to binocular disparity in anticorrelated RDSs, suggesting that further cortical processing in extrastriate areas is necessary to fully account for the matching computation. We examined neural responses to dynamic RDSs, both normal (correlated) and anticorrelated, in area V4 of the monkey visual cortex. More than half of the V4 cells were sensitive to the horizontal disparity embedded in a correlated RDS. Most of them greatly attenuated their selectivity for disparity when the RDS was anticorrelated. This attenuation was apparent from the response onset, and the degree of attenuation did not correlate with neuronal response latencies. Unlike the disparity tuning of V1 neurons to anticorrelated RDSs, that of V4 neurons was not an inversion of tuning to normal RDSs. Our results suggest that responses to false matches between contrast-reversed dots in the left and right eye images elicited in V1 are substantially reduced by the stage of V4.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371518      PMCID: PMC6729782          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5292-03.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

Review 1.  Neural computations underlying depth perception.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream.

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pooled, but not single-neuron, responses in macaque V4 represent a solution to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdolrahmani ا; Takahiro Doi; Hiroshi M Shiozaki; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coding of stereoscopic depth information in visual areas V3 and V3A.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Syed A Chowdhury; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatial pooling inherent to intrinsic signal optical imaging might cause V2 to resemble a solution to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Takahiro Doi; Mohammad Abdolrahmani; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reply to Doi et al.: Functional architecture matters in the formation of perception.

Authors:  Hong Yin; Peng Fu; Haidong D Lu; Hisashi Tanigawa; Anna W Roe; Gang Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Weighted parallel contributions of binocular correlation and match signals to conscious perception of depth.

Authors:  Ichiro Fujita; Takahiro Doi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Binocular depth processing in the ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Rufin Vogels; Peter Janssen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Stereoscopic vision in the absence of the lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; A David Milner; Andrew J Parker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.