Literature DB >> 15370779

Patients' perception of coercion in acute psychiatric wards. An intervention study.

Knut W Sørgaard1.   

Abstract

A project based on the "Breakthrough series" for reducing the patients' perception of coercion in psychiatric acute wards is presented. Three different measures were chosen: 1) engagement of the patients in the formulation of the treatment plan, 2) frequent and regular joint patient and staff evaluations, and 3) renegotiation of treatment plans if necessary. A 5-week baseline was followed by a 12-week intervention period. Anonymously administered self-rating scales were used: the Coercion Ladder and the SPRI questionnaire. Two questions addressing aversive events (verbal and physical) were added. Participation rates were 86% (patients). Data from 190 admissions were analysed. The interventions resulted in only marginal changes in two of eight parameters (the staff's respect and understanding and on total satisfaction with the received help) and no change in experienced coercion. Seclusion accounted for 46% of the explained variance (62%) and participation in the formulation of the treatment plan for only 8% in regression analyses where perceived coercion was the dependent variable; a third of the patients had experienced insulting communication from the staff, and 10% physical harassment during their stay. It was concluded that: 1) the average value of experienced coercion was low, 2) taking part in the planning and evaluation of the treatment had marginal effect on experienced coercion, and 3) the main predictor of felt coercion was seclusion. Actions taken primarily to control behaviour were more strongly related to perceived coercion than aspects of compulsory treatment. More thorough analysis of seclusion and improved routines for its implementation are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370779     DOI: 10.1080/08039480410005819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0803-9488            Impact factor:   2.202


  11 in total

1.  Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2006-02

2.  The methodical work approach and the reduction in the use of seclusion: how did it work?

Authors:  Christien E Boumans; Serge J W Walvoort; Jos I M Egger; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission. A systematic literature review on outcome diversity.

Authors:  Thomas W Kallert; Matthias Glöckner; Matthias Schützwohl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Differences of mentally ill patients' satisfaction degree during their involuntary or voluntary stay in a psychiatric clinic.

Authors:  Aspasia Goula; Evaggelos Margetis; Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli; Dimitra Latsou; Vasiliki Gkioka
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 5.  The Use of Physical Restraint in Norwegian Adult Psychiatric Hospitals.

Authors:  Rolf Wynn
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2015-11-23

6.  Consumers and Carer perspectives on poor practice and the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health settings: results from Australian focus groups.

Authors:  Lisa M Brophy; Catherine E Roper; Bridget E Hamilton; Juan José Tellez; Bernadette M McSherry
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2016-02-06

7.  Attitudinal variance among patients, next of kin and health care professionals towards the use of containment measures in three psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger; Etienne Buehler; Sonja Moetteli; Georges Klein; Simone Beeri; Thomas Reisch
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.

Authors:  Jan Bergk; Erich Flammer; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Involuntary admission in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rolf Wynn
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2018-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.