Literature DB >> 15370588

Registration in the danish hip arthroplasty registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications.

Alma Pedersen1, Søren Johnsen, Søren Overgaard, Kjeld Søballe, Henrik T Sørensen, Ulf Lucht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few publications regarding the validity of data in hip arthroplasty registers. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (DHR) is a nationwide clinical database of THAs and revisions in Denmark. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the completeness of registration of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and revisions in the DHR from 1995-2000. In addition, the positive predictive value (PPV) of registered data for diagnoses in patients undergoing primary THA and postoperative complications was analyzed. Completeness was assessed using the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) as a reference, which is a nationwide and population-based registry of all somatic hospital admissions since 1977. The positive predictive value of registered data was assessed by review of medical records and preoperative radiographs from samples of randomly selected patients registered in the DHR using a standardized form.
RESULTS: The overall completeness of registration for primary THAs and/or revisions was 94% (26,129 patients registered in both NRP and DHR and 27,757 patients registered in the NRP). There was a lower degree of completeness for revisions than for primary THAs (81% versus 94%). The completeness did not vary substantially according to gender and age. Completeness of registration was lower for university hospitals than for other hospitals (91% versus 95%), and for low-volume hospitals (87%) relative to those with medium (92%) and high volumes (96%). Overall, the diagnoses in patients undergoing primary THA could be confirmed in 84% (387/459) of the patients who were reviewed. The diagnosis of fresh fracture of the proximal femur was confirmed in only one third (22/73) of the cases. Postoperative complications were confirmed in two-thirds (36/54) of the patients reviewed. The specificity of the registration of postoperative complications was, however, only one-third (8/26).
INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry is a potentially valuable tool for quality improvement and research due to the high degree of completeness of registrations regarding THA, and its moderate-to-high positive predictive value of registration for diagnoses in patients undergoing primary THA. However, information on several diagnoses for primary THA and on postoperative complications should be used with caution. Copyright 2004 Taylor & Francis

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370588     DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001213-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  53 in total

1.  Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Wolfgang Janda; Mark Agreiter; Reinhard Schuh; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A Single Positive Tissue Culture Increases the Risk of Rerevision of Clinically Aseptic THA: A National Register Study.

Authors:  Nikolaj R Milandt; Per H Gundtoft; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluation of factors influencing accuracy of principal procedure coding based on ICD-9-CM: an Iranian study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Farzandipour; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-05-07

4.  A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Erik Malchau; Nanna Sillesen; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Survival of primary total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Christoffer Rud-Sørensen; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Anders Hammerich Riis; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Completeness and positive predictive value of registration of upper limb embolectomy in the Danish National Vascular Registry.

Authors:  Ljubica V Andersen; Leif S Mortensen; Jes S Lindholt; Ole Faergeman; Eskild W Henneberg; Lars Frost
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  The Danish Urogynaecological Database: establishment, completeness and validity.

Authors:  Rikke Guldberg; Søren Brostrøm; Jesper Kjær Hansen; Linda Kærlev; Kim Oren Gradel; Bente Mertz Nørgård; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs.

Authors:  Leif I Havelin; Anne M Fenstad; Roger Salomonsson; Frank Mehnert; Ove Furnes; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Peter Herberts; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants.

Authors:  Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Lars B Engesaeter; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Allogeneic blood transfusion and prognosis following total hip replacement: a population-based follow up study.

Authors:  Alma B Pedersen; Frank Mehnert; Soren Overgaard; Soren P Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.