Literature DB >> 15370416

Searching for an enhanced predictive tool for mutagenicity.

G Klopman1, H Zhu, M A Fuller, R D Saiakhov.   

Abstract

The Multiple Computer Automated Structure Evaluation (MCASE) program was used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of organic compounds. The experimental Ames test mutagenic activities for 2513 chemicals were collected from various literature sources. All chemicals have experimental results in one or more Salmonella tester strains. A general mutagenicity data set and fifteen individual Salmonella test strain data sets were compiled. Analysis of the learning sets by the MCASE program resulted in the derivation of good correlations between chemical structure and mutagenic activity. Significant improvement was obtained as more data was added to the learning databases when compared with the results of our previous reports. Several biophores were identified as being responsible for the mutagenic activity of the majority of active chemicals in each individual mutagenicity module. It was shown that the multiple-database mutagenicity model showed a clear advantage over normally used single-database models. The expertise produced by this analysis can be used to predict the mutagenic potential of new compounds.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370416     DOI: 10.1080/10629360410001724897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

1.  MultiCASE Platform for In Silico Toxicology.

Authors:  Suman K Chakravarti; Roustem D Saiakhov
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Todd M Martin; Lin Ye; Alexander Sedykh; Douglas M Young; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Supporting read-across using biological data.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Mounir Bouhifd; Elizabeth Donley; Laura Egnash; Nicole Kleinstreuer; E Dinant Kroese; Zhichao Liu; Thomas Luechtefeld; Jessica Palmer; David Pamies; Jie Shen; Volker Strauss; Shengde Wu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Ivan Rusyn; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity using QSAR methods: a case study of sulfur mustard and its breakdown products.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz; Gino Begluitti; Terry Tincher; John Wheeler; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.