Literature DB >> 15370356

An empirical test of Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory of hypnosis.

Graham A Jamieson1, Peter W Sheehan.   

Abstract

Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory predicts impaired performance on tasks indexing frontally mediated supervisory attentional functions during hypnosis, especially for high susceptibles. This prediction is tested using Stroop task behavioral performance to measure aspects of anterior-mediated supervisory attentional function. All measures of anterior-mediated attentional functions significantly declined during hypnosis. Interactions be-tween susceptibility and hypnosis condition showed specific changes among hypnotized high susceptibles. Total Stroop errors (failures of attentional suppression) were significantly higher in hypnosis for high, but not low, susceptibles. Tellegen's experiential mental set was highest for hypnotized highs. Use of rehearsal strategy (instrumental set) decreased significantly in hypnosis but more so for highs than lows. Results suggest that "absorption" in hypnosis may be a consequence of dissociated anterior attentional control. It is proposed that dissociated control emerges from the functional disconnection of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370356     DOI: 10.1080/0020714049052349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn        ISSN: 0020-7144


  11 in total

1.  Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; A Macerata; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The power of charisma--perceived charisma inhibits the frontal executive network of believers in intercessory prayer.

Authors:  Uffe Schjoedt; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; Armin W Geertz; Torben E Lund; Andreas Roepstorff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Hypnotizability and Performance on a Prism Adaptation Test.

Authors:  Manuel Menzocchi; Giulio Mecacci; Andrea Zeppi; Giancarlo Carli; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Revisiting the association between hypnotisability and blink rate.

Authors:  Francesco Di Gruttola; Paolo Orsini; Maria C Carboncini; Bruno Rossi; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  VIRTUAL REALITY HYPNOSIS.

Authors:  Shelley Wiechman Askay; David R Patterson; Sam R Sharar
Journal:  Contemp Hypn       Date:  2009-03

6.  Method for simultaneous fMRI/EEG data collection during a focused attention suggestion for differential thermal sensation.

Authors:  Pamela K Douglas; Maureen Pisani; Rory Reid; Austin Head; Edward Lau; Ebrahim Mirakhor; Jennifer Bramen; Billi Gordon; Ariana Anderson; Wesley T Kerr; Chajoon Cheong; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Hypnotizability and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphysms in Italians.

Authors:  Silvano Presciuttini; Alessandro Gialluisi; Serena Barbuti; Michele Curcio; Fabrizio Scatena; Giancarlo Carli; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  New views of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Hypnotic induction is followed by state-like changes in the organization of EEG functional connectivity in the theta and beta frequency bands in high-hypnotically susceptible individuals.

Authors:  Graham A Jamieson; Adrian P Burgess
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Prefrontal Cortex and Suggestion: Hypnosis vs. Placebo Effects.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.