Literature DB >> 15369889

Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning.

Astrid J S F Visschers-Pleijers1, Diana H J M Dolmans, Ineke H A P Wolfhagen, Cees P M Van Der Vleuten.   

Abstract

Many educational institutions use instructional approaches such as problem-based learning (PBL), in which collaborative learning plays an important role. There is little research, however, that describes which factors are responsible for the success of collaboration. The purpose of this study was twofold, i.e. to explore cognitive interactions taking place between students in tutorial groups and to examine whether the coding system of is usable to analyze these interactions. The focus was on elaborations and co-constructions, which are indicators of individual and collaborative knowledge construction in a group. Videotapes of three PBL sessions were transcribed, in which tutorial groups of the Maastricht Medical School were discussing a problem. The results showed that cognitive interactions could be found in the tutorial groups and that it was possible to analyze them. Co-constructions seemed most easy to elicit from the transcripts.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15369889     DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001679064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  8 in total

1.  Is learning in problem-based learning cumulative?

Authors:  Elaine H J Yew; Esther Chng; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  Evaluation of effectiveness of instruction and study habits in two consecutive clinical semesters of the medical curriculum Munich (MeCuM) reveals the need for more time for self study and higher frequency of assessment.

Authors:  Sophia Mueller; Nina Weichert; Veit Stoecklein; Ariane Hammitzsch; Giulia Pascuito; Christian Krug; Matthias Holzer; Mona Pfeiffer; Matthias Siebeck; Ralf Schmidmaier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zuzana de Jong; Jessica Ab van Nies; Sonja Wm Peters; Sylvia Vink; Friedo W Dekker; Albert Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  The relationship between the monitored performance of tutors and students at PBL tutorials and the marked hypotheses generated by students in a hybrid curriculum.

Authors:  Jonas I Addae; Pradeep Sahu; Bidyadhar Sa
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

5.  Effects of competitive learning tools on medical students: A case study.

Authors:  Alfredo Corell; Luisa M Regueras; Elena Verdú; María J Verdú; Juan P de Castro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Students' engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Shivananda Nayak B; Vineeth Sridevi; Pradeepkumar Sahu; Nagendra Subbaramaiah; Latha Telang; Prashanthkumar Goudappala; Chandrakanth Halappa Kariappa; Akanksha Sharma; Maanasa Sagari K; Akash S Nayak
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2021-01

7.  Medical students perceive better group learning processes when large classes are made to seem small.

Authors:  Juliette Hommes; Onyebuchi A Arah; Willem de Grave; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Gerard M J Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives.

Authors:  Maha Iqbal; Gary M Velan; Anthony J O'Sullivan; Chinthaka Balasooriya
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.