BACKGROUND: Hemolysis is regularly encountered in clinical specimens and often interferes with a variety of laboratory test methods. Although not widely recognized, immunoassays based on nonisotopic detection systems can also be affected by hemolysis. For this reason, we investigated the effect of differing amounts of hemolysis across a range of values for several immunoassays on the Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics ECi and Roche Elecsys platforms. METHODS: Hemolysate was prepared from whole blood and spiked at varying concentrations into pooled patient serum samples for different analytes. RESULTS: Out of the 21 analytes tested, six (28.6%) exhibited significant increases or decreases in measured concentrations with increasing amounts of hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although immunoassays are generally thought to be impervious to hemolysis interference, hemolysis can interfere in immunoassay testing platforms. For these reasons, we recommend that laboratories conduct hemolysis interference studies for all laboratory test protocols.
BACKGROUND:Hemolysis is regularly encountered in clinical specimens and often interferes with a variety of laboratory test methods. Although not widely recognized, immunoassays based on nonisotopic detection systems can also be affected by hemolysis. For this reason, we investigated the effect of differing amounts of hemolysis across a range of values for several immunoassays on the Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics ECi and Roche Elecsys platforms. METHODS: Hemolysate was prepared from whole blood and spiked at varying concentrations into pooled patient serum samples for different analytes. RESULTS: Out of the 21 analytes tested, six (28.6%) exhibited significant increases or decreases in measured concentrations with increasing amounts of hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although immunoassays are generally thought to be impervious to hemolysis interference, hemolysis can interfere in immunoassay testing platforms. For these reasons, we recommend that laboratories conduct hemolysis interference studies for all laboratory test protocols.
Authors: H J Roth; R M Leithäuser; H Doppelmayr; M Doppelmayr; H Finkernagel; S P von Duvillard; S Korff; H A Katus; Evangelos Giannitsis; R Beneke Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Nicholas J Heyer; James H Derzon; Linda Winges; Colleen Shaw; Diana Mass; Susan R Snyder; Paul Epner; James H Nichols; Julie A Gayken; Dennis Ernst; Edward B Liebow Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Michal Sheleg; Carrie L Yochum; Jason R Richardson; George C Wagner; Renping Zhou Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Gabriela de Jonge; Talita L Dos Santos; Bruno R Cruz; Mackelly Simionatto; Jeanine I M Bittencourt; Everson A Krum; Mariane F Moss; Danielle Cristyane K Borato Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.352