Literature DB >> 15369039

Factors related to abstinence in a telephone helpline for smoking cessation.

Asgeir R Helgason1, Tanja Tomson, Karl E Lund, Rosaria Galanti, Staffan Ahnve, Hans Gilljam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate that shortage of cessation counsellors may be a major barrier for tobacco prevention among physicians. Telephone helplines (quitlines) may be an option. The effectiveness of the Swedish quitline and factors related to abstinence from smoking 12 months after the first contact were assessed.
METHOD: Subjects included 694 smokers calling a reactive (no contact initiated by the counsellors) and 900 smokers calling a proactive (four or five contacts initiated by the counsellors after the first call) quitline for smoking cessation. The subjects were followed up 12 months after the first call using a mailed questionnaire assessing current abstinence, stages of change and factors potentially related to abstinence rates.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 70% of the subjects. Women receiving the proactive treatment reported 34% abstinence rates compared with 27% for those receiving the reactive treatment (p=0.03). For men the abstinence rates were 27% and 28%, respectively (p=0.80). Factors significantly related to abstinence in the adjusted analysis included no nicotine use at base-line, the adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval being 6.4 (2.1-19.4), additional support from a health care professional 3.5 (1.0-12.3), additional social support 3.1 (1.6-6.1), stress or depressive mood 2.7 (1.6-4.7), nicotine replacement therapy for five weeks or more 2.1 (1.1-4.0), and exposure to second-hand smoke 1.9 (1.1-3.3). The use of oral tobacco did not significantly increase current abstinence.
CONCLUSION: Quitlines are effective as an adjunct to the health care system. For women a proactive treatment may be more effective than a reactive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15369039     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/14.3.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  20 in total

Review 1.  New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Robin Mermelstein; Linda M Collins; Megan E Piper; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Bruce A Christiansen; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-04

2.  Promoting tobacco cessation and smoke-free workplaces through community outreach partnerships in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Elba C Díaz-Toro; Maria E Fernández; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; William A Calo; Ana Patricia Ortiz; Luz M Mejía; Carlos A Mazas; Maria del Carmen Santos-Ortiz; David W Wetter
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Minimal dataset for quitlines: a best practice.

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Deborah Ossip-Klein; Linda Bailey; Jessie Saul
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  An observational study of the Korean proactive quitline service for smoking cessation and relapse prevention.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Myung; Hong Gwan Seo; Eun Cheol Park; Min Kyung Lim; Yeol Kim
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Timothy B Baker; Robin J Mermelstein; Megan E Piper; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Bruce A Christiansen; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-04

6.  The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products.

Authors:  Karl Erik Lund; Ann McNeill; Janne Scheffels
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Trial design: The St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Cancer Survivors Tobacco Quit Line study.

Authors:  Taghrid Asfar; Robert C Klesges; Stacy D Sanford; Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Grant Somes; James M Boyett; Harry Lando
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Eva Nohlert; Ake Tegelberg; Per Tillgren; Pia Johansson; Andreas Rosenblad; Asgeir R Helgason
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Long-term follow-up of a high- and a low-intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dental setting--a randomized trial.

Authors:  Eva Nohlert; John Öhrvik; Åke Tegelberg; Per Tillgren; Ásgeir R Helgason
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Symptoms in smokers trying to quit.

Authors:  Tanja Tomson; Mats Toftgård; Hans Gilljam; Asgeir R Helgason
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.