Literature DB >> 15367252

Outcomes and costs of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders: a Markov model.

Montserrat Vera-Llonch1, Thomas E Delea, Erin Richardson, Marcia Rupnow, Amy Grogg, Gerry Oster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare expected outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders who are treated with risperidone versus olanzapine.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to examine outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The time frame of interest was 1 year. The model focused particular attention on the likelihood of therapy switching and discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent side effects, as the efficacy of these two agents is similar. Measures of interest included the incidence of relapse and selected side effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin-related disorders and diabetes, expected change in body weight, and the percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year. Costs of antipsychotic therapy and psychiatric and nonpsychiatric services also were examined.
RESULTS: At 1 year, the rate of EPS was estimated to be slightly higher for risperidone, as was the incidence of symptomatic prolactin-related disorders. The expected incidence of diabetes mellitus, while low, was slightly higher for olanzapine. Approximately 25% and 4% of olanzapine and risperidone patients, respectively, were projected to experience an increase in body weight > or = 7%. The estimated percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year was higher for risperidone than olanzapine (76.9% vs. 45.6%, respectively). Expected mean total costs of care per month of therapy were $2163 for risperidone and $2316 for olanzapine. Results from sensitivity analyses suggest that the probability of therapy discontinuation following weight gain >5 kg would have to be lower than 0.1 for the number of patients remaining on therapy at the end of 1 year to be the same for risperidone and olanzapine.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with risperidone, treatment with olanzapine may result in greater increases in body weight, higher rates of therapy discontinuation, and higher costs of medical-care services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15367252     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  13 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of long-acting risperidone injection versus alternative antipsychotic agents in patients with schizophrenia in the USA.

Authors:  Natalie C Edwards; Julie C Locklear; Marcia F T Rupnow; Ronald J Diamond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Atypical antipsychotics and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia: risk factors, monitoring, and healthcare implications.

Authors:  Henry J Riordan; Paola Antonini; Michael F Murphy
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2011-09

3.  Cost-effectiveness model of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia in the US.

Authors:  Natalie C Edwards; Marcia F T Rupnow; Chris L Pashos; Marc F Botteman; Ronald J Diamond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Modelling approaches: the case of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bart M S Heeg; Joep Damen; Erik Buskens; Sue Caleo; Frank de Charro; Ben A van Hout
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost-utility analysis of treatment with olanzapine compared with other antipsychotic treatments in patients with schizophrenia in the pan-European SOHO study.

Authors:  Martin Knapp; Frank Windmeijer; Jacqueline Brown; Stathis Kontodimas; Spyridon Tzivelekis; Josep Maria Haro; Mark Ratcliffe; Jihyung Hong; Diego Novick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Appraisal of patient-level health economic models of severe mental illness: systematic review.

Authors:  James Altunkaya; Jung-Seok Lee; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Felicity Waite; Daniel Freeman; José Leal
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Estimated economic benefits from low-frequency administration of atypical antipsychotics in treatment of schizophrenia: a decision model.

Authors:  Nicolas M Furiak; James C Gahn; Robert W Klein; Stephen B Camper; Kent H Summers
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of antipsychotics in reducing schizophrenia relapses.

Authors:  Antonio J García-Ruiz; Lucía Pérez-Costillas; Ana C Montesinos; Javier Alcalde; Itziar Oyagüez; Miguel A Casado
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2012-04-10

9.  Cost-effectiveness model comparing olanzapine and other oral atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States.

Authors:  Nicolas M Furiak; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Robert W Klein; Lee J Smolen; Anthony H Lawson; Robert R Conley; Steven D Culler
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2009-04-07

10.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of paliperidone palmitate for treating schizophrenia in Greece.

Authors:  Thomas R Einarson; Maria Geitona; Alexandros Chaidemenos; Vasiliki Karpouza; Theodoros Mougiakos; Periklis Paterakis; Dimitrios Ploumpidis; Dionyssios Potamitis-Komis; Roman Zilbershtein; Colin Vicente; Charles Piwko; Panagiotis Kakkavas; Konstantina Paparouni; Rasmus C D Jensen; Michiel E H Hemels
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.