Literature DB >> 15367229

Effect of sirolimus withdrawal in patients with deteriorating renal function.

Bruce Kaplan1, Jesse Schold, Titte Srinivas, Karl Womer, David P Foley, Pamela Patton, Richard Howard, Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche.   

Abstract

Sirolimus has been an important addition to immunosuppressive regimens utilized in kidney transplantation. However, sirolimus can potentiate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity by some still uncertain mechanisms. Studies have demonstrated that withdrawal of a CNI under sirolimus immunosuppression can improve renal function. However, it has yet to be demonstrated that withdrawal of sirolimus from such a regimen can also improve renal function and reverse progressive functional deterioration. We studied 17 patients who developed deterioration of renal function while on a CNI and sirolimus. Once an established deterioration in renal function was noted, sirolimus was withdrawn from the regimen and replaced with mycophenolate mofetil. Out of 17 patients with a negative slope in 1/cr, 15 demonstrated a positive treatment effect (change to a positive slope). On aggregate, renal function improved by 18% (creatinine 2.75-2.24 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol improved, as did hematocrit values after withdrawal. The majority of patients on a CNI and sirolimus regimen who experience deterioration in renal function demonstrate improvement in renal function after withdrawal of sirolimus. This strategy may be particularly useful in those patients where CNI withdrawal is considered to be of high immunologic or metabolic risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15367229     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  7 in total

1.  Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.

Authors:  Darshika Chhabra; Anton I Skaro; Joseph R Leventhal; Pranav Dalal; Gaurav Shah; Edward Wang; Lorenzo Gallon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Identifying biomarkers as diagnostic tools in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Valeria R Mas; Thomas F Mueller; Kellie J Archer; Daniel G Maluf
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  Five-year follow-up of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with allogeneic islets: the UIC experience.

Authors:  Meirigeng Qi; Katie Kinzer; Kirstie K Danielson; Joan Martellotto; Barbara Barbaro; Yong Wang; James T Bui; Ron C Gaba; Grace Knuttinen; Raquel Garcia-Roca; Ivo Tzvetanov; Andrew Heitman; Maureen Davis; James J McGarrigle; Enrico Benedetti; Jose Oberholzer
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 4.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 5.  Late kidney allograft loss: what we know about it, and what we can do about it.

Authors:  Anthony M Jevnikar; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result.

Authors:  Titte R Srinivas; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  A prospective, multinational pharmacoepidemiological study of clinical conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Bjorn Nashan; Maria Del Carmen Rial; Pablo Raffaele; Graeme Russ; Josep Campistol; Mark D Pescovitz; Paul A Keown
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.