Literature DB >> 15366407

Modified subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicocele and varicocele-associated infertility.

Min-Che Tung1, William J Huang, Kuang-Kuo Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with varicocele comprise 15% of males in general population. Varicocele is considered the most cost-effectively treatable cause of male infertility. We introduce a modification in technique of subinguinal varicocelectomy and review the outcome of 58 patients from July 2000 to July 2002.
METHODS: Four out of the 58 cases had both pain and infertility. For the 31 infertility patients, 8 (25.8%) were azoospermic, and testis biopsy was also performed. Post-operatively, we followed these patients on every-3-month basis with semen analysis, physical recovery and situation of fecundity. Patients with painful varicocele (n = 31) were also followed with physical check-up and optional semen analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-four men had left varicocele only, while 4 had bilateral lesions. In the painful varicocele group, 28 of 31 patients (90%) felt complete resolution of pain and 3 patients (10%) felt partial resolution of pain. In the infertility group, 8 patients had asthenospermia only, 15 had oligo-asthenospermia and 8 were azoospermic. During the follow-up, 6 out of the 23 non-azoospermic couples (32%) got spontaneous pregnancy in 7 months in average. For the 8 azoospermic patients, the simultaneous testicular biopsy revealed Sertoli-cell-only syndrome in 4, maturation arrest in 3 and hyalinization of tubules in 1. However, they stayed azoospermic after the procedure. In oligo-asthenospermic patients (n = 15), mean sperm concentration improved from 6.1 to 24.2 x 10(6)/cc (p < 0.02). Improvement in morphology and motility were only significant in the patients with grade 3 varicocele.
CONCLUSIONS: The newly modified technique of subinguinal varicocelectomy is an effective procedure to either eliminate the pain of varicocele or improve the semen parameters in infertility patients. The procedure is also very promising in avoiding complication and residual lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15366407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  7 in total

1.  Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Song Yu; Won Sik Ham; Dong Hyuk Kang; Kyu Hyun Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Orchialgia and the chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Authors:  Parviz K Kavoussi; Raymond A Costabile
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Should we expand the indications for varicocele treatment?

Authors:  Ioannis Vakalopoulos; Spyridon Kampantais; Stefania Lymperi; Nikolaos Grivas; Anastasios Ioannidis; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Vassilios Nikolaou; Georgios Dimitriadis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

4.  Outcome of Loupe-Assisted Sub-inguinal Varicocelectomy in Infertile Men.

Authors:  Selim S Abdelrahman; Bayoumy I Eassa
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2012-06-20

5.  Varicocele Repair Improves Testicular Histology in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

Authors:  Murat Ustuner; Hasan Yilmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Seyfettin Ciftci; Ali Saribacak; Bahri Serkan Aynur; Hikmet Yasar; Mustafa Melih Culha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  A review of varicocele repair for pain.

Authors:  Ryan C Owen; Benjamin J McCormick; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-05

Review 7.  Varicocele and Testicular Pain: A Review.

Authors:  Sunghyun Paick; Woo Suk Choi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.400

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.