RATIONALE: The neuroendocrine response to intravenous citalopram may provide an acute, functional, in vivo measure of the neural serotonin (5-HT) system. OBJECTIVE: To refine the quantification of acute neuroendocrine responses following intravenous citalopram in studies of 5-HT function. METHODS: In 75 adult healthy subjects taking part in four similar protocols, we measured plasma prolactin and cortisol, as well as serial citalopram concentrations following intravenous citalopram (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 0.33 mg/kg) and placebo. The relationship between the AUC for intravenous citalopram during the first 150 min (AUC(150)) and the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response was determined. The role of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, as well as sensitivity to placebo injections, in influencing the neuroendocrine response to citalopram was then evaluated. RESULTS:Citalopram produced a dose-dependent increase in cortisol and prolactin. The maximal increase from baseline correlated significantly but modestly with citalopram's AUC(150) (prolactin r(2)=0.23, P<0.0001; cortisol r(2)=0.3, P<0.0001). Additionally, citalopram's AUC(150) was affected by between-subject differences in both the peripheral and central volume of distribution. However, the neuroendocrine responses to citalopram did not correlate with the responses to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The parenteral citalopram challenge test is characterized by a modest concentration-response relationship, with concentration influenced by variable PK factors. Accounting for individual differences in drug distribution may improve the power of the citalopram challenge test, when used as an in vivo measure of central 5-HT function.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: The neuroendocrine response to intravenous citalopram may provide an acute, functional, in vivo measure of the neural serotonin (5-HT) system. OBJECTIVE: To refine the quantification of acute neuroendocrine responses following intravenous citalopram in studies of 5-HT function. METHODS: In 75 adult healthy subjects taking part in four similar protocols, we measured plasma prolactin and cortisol, as well as serial citalopram concentrations following intravenous citalopram (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 0.33 mg/kg) and placebo. The relationship between the AUC for intravenous citalopram during the first 150 min (AUC(150)) and the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response was determined. The role of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, as well as sensitivity to placebo injections, in influencing the neuroendocrine response to citalopram was then evaluated. RESULTS:Citalopram produced a dose-dependent increase in cortisol and prolactin. The maximal increase from baseline correlated significantly but modestly with citalopram's AUC(150) (prolactin r(2)=0.23, P<0.0001; cortisol r(2)=0.3, P<0.0001). Additionally, citalopram's AUC(150) was affected by between-subject differences in both the peripheral and central volume of distribution. However, the neuroendocrine responses to citalopram did not correlate with the responses to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The parenteral citalopram challenge test is characterized by a modest concentration-response relationship, with concentration influenced by variable PK factors. Accounting for individual differences in drug distribution may improve the power of the citalopram challenge test, when used as an in vivo measure of central 5-HT function.
Authors: C Faravelli; A Brat; G Marchetti; F Franchi; L Padeletti; A Michelucci; A Pastorino Journal: Neuropsychobiology Date: 1983 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: H Kojima; T Terao; M Iwakawa; A Soya; N Inoue; Y Shiraishi; Y Son; S Soeda; N Ueda; R Yoshimura; J Nakamura Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Lauren D Garfield; David Dixon; Petra Nowotny; Francis E Lotrich; Bruce G Pollock; Sean D Kristjansson; Peter M Doré; Eric J Lenze Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: M Trento; C Kucich; P Tibaldi; S Gennari; S Tedesco; M Balbo; E Arvat; F Cavallo; E Ghigo; M Porta Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: R Berardelli; E Margarito; F Ghiggia; A Picu; M Balbo; L Bonelli; R Giordano; I Karamouzis; M Bo; E Ghigo; E Arvat Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Francis E Lotrich; Bruce G Pollock; Margaret Kirshner; Robert F Ferrell; Charles F Reynolds Iii Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Ulla Knorr; Maj Vinberg; Allan Hansen; Marianne Klose; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Linda Hilsted; Jørgen Hasselstrøm; Ulrik Gether; Per Winkel; Christian Gluud; Jørn Wetterslev; Lars Vedel Kessing Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 3.240