RATIONALE: Assessment of the benefits versus risks associated with antidepressant use during pregnancy must include an analysis of possible drug effects on fetal development. Human studies indicate that prenatal fluoxetine exposure is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Animal modeling may provide useful information concerning possible long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Limitations in previous such studies using rat models may be overcome using a guinea pig model in which fluoxetine is delivered by osmotic pump throughout pregnancy. METHODS: Initial experiments measured the half-life of fluoxetine and dosing required to achieve human therapeutic blood levels in the guinea pig. In subsequent experiments, guinea pigs received fluoxetine or vehicle via osmotic pump or no treatment throughout pregnancy. Outcome measures included: pregnancy characteristics, weight gain, and, in offspring as adults, pain threshold, acoustic startle responses and prepulse inhibition. RESULTS: There was no effect of treatment group on gestation length, number of live-births or still-births, maternal or offspring weight gain, and acoustic startle responses. In adult offspring, pain threshold was decreased by vehicle treatment during gestation. Prenatal fluoxetine increased pain threshold, relative to vehicle controls. Prepulse inhibition of startle was increased in adult offspring treated prenatally with either vehicle or fluoxetine compared to no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The guinea pig provides a practicable and clinically relevant model of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Adult guinea pigs exposed to fluoxetine prenatally showed increased thermal pain thresholds but no change in prepulse inhibition, indicating selective long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on serotonin-modulated behaviors. Further studies on long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on nociception are warranted.
RATIONALE: Assessment of the benefits versus risks associated with antidepressant use during pregnancy must include an analysis of possible drug effects on fetal development. Human studies indicate that prenatal fluoxetine exposure is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Animal modeling may provide useful information concerning possible long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Limitations in previous such studies using rat models may be overcome using a guinea pig model in which fluoxetine is delivered by osmotic pump throughout pregnancy. METHODS: Initial experiments measured the half-life of fluoxetine and dosing required to achieve human therapeutic blood levels in the guinea pig. In subsequent experiments, guinea pigs received fluoxetine or vehicle via osmotic pump or no treatment throughout pregnancy. Outcome measures included: pregnancy characteristics, weight gain, and, in offspring as adults, pain threshold, acoustic startle responses and prepulse inhibition. RESULTS: There was no effect of treatment group on gestation length, number of live-births or still-births, maternal or offspring weight gain, and acoustic startle responses. In adult offspring, pain threshold was decreased by vehicle treatment during gestation. Prenatal fluoxetine increased pain threshold, relative to vehicle controls. Prepulse inhibition of startle was increased in adult offspring treated prenatally with either vehicle or fluoxetine compared to no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The guinea pig provides a practicable and clinically relevant model of prenatal fluoxetine exposure. Adult guinea pigs exposed to fluoxetine prenatally showed increased thermal pain thresholds but no change in prepulse inhibition, indicating selective long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on serotonin-modulated behaviors. Further studies on long-term effects of prenatal fluoxetine on nociception are warranted.
Authors: José Borrell; José Miguel Vela; Angel Arévalo-Martin; Eduardo Molina-Holgado; Carmen Guaza Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: L L Gorman; M W O'Hara; B Figueiredo; S Hayes; F Jacquemain; M H Kammerer; C M Klier; S Rosi; G Seneviratne; A-L Sutter-Dallay Journal: Br J Psychiatry Suppl Date: 2004-02
Authors: J D Amsterdam; J Fawcett; F M Quitkin; F W Reimherr; J F Rosenbaum; D Michelson; M Hornig-Rohan; C M Beasley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Eszter Farkas; Adám Institóris; Ferenc Domoki; András Mihály; Paul G M Luiten; Ferenc Bari Journal: Brain Res Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Victoria Hendrick; Lynne M Smith; Rita Suri; Sun Hwang; Desiree Haynes; Lori Altshuler Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: David J Brunswick; Jay D Amsterdam; Jan Fawcett; Frederic M Quitkin; Frederick W Reimherr; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Charles M Beasley Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Catherine F Capello; Chase H Bourke; James C Ritchie; Zachary N Stowe; D Jeffrey Newport; Amanda Nemeroff; Michael J Owens Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 4.030