Literature DB >> 15364967

Histologic grade, but not SYT-SSX fusion type, is an important prognostic factor in patients with synovial sarcoma: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.

Louis Guillou1, Jean Benhattar, Françoise Bonichon, Gabrielle Gallagher, Philippe Terrier, Edouard Stauffer, Nicolas de Saint Aubain Somerhausen, Jean-Jacques Michels, Gernot Jundt, Dominique Ranchère Vince, Sophia Taylor, Muriel Genevay, Françoise Collin, Martine Trassard, Jean-Michel Coindre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of SYT-SSX fusion type, in comparison with other factors, in a population of 165 patients with synovial sarcoma (SS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 165 patients with SS (141 with localized disease at diagnosis) were studied retrospectively. The following parameters were examined for their potential prognostic value: age at diagnosis, sex, tumor site (extremities v proximal/truncal), size, histology, mitotic count, necrosis, histologic grade (Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer system), stage (1997 tumor-node-metastasis system classification), surgical margin status (assessed histologically), and fusion type (SYT-SSX1 v SYT-SSX2). Median follow-up time was 37 months (range, 2 to 302 months).
RESULTS: Among those patients with localized disease at diagnosis, median and 5-year disease-specific survivals (DSS) for the SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 subgroups were 126 months and 67.4% versus 82 months and 63.2%, respectively (P = .12). Median and 5-year metastasis-free survivals (MFS) were 84 months and 54.2% for SYT-SSX1 versus 50 months and 47.6% for SYT-SSX2 (P = .76). Univariate analyses showed that high histologic grade (grade 3), high mitotic count (>/= 10 mitoses/10 high-power fields), stage III disease, size greater than 7 cm, tumor necrosis, and presence of areas of poorly differentiated morphology were significant adverse prognostic factors for DSS and MFS, whereas SYT-SSX fusion type, tumor histology (biphasic v monophasic), and patient sex were not. Age greater than 35 years adversely affected DSS but not MFS. In multivariate analyses, histologic grade was the most significant prognostic factor for both DSS and MFS.
CONCLUSION: For patients with localized SS, histologic grade but not SYT-SSX fusion type is a strong predictor of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15364967     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  73 in total

Review 1.  Pericardial synovial sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yoshino; Yasuo Sekine; Eitetsu Koh; Yuta Kume; Hiroyuki Saito; Sho Kimura; Hiromichi Hamada; Di Wu; Kenzo Hiroshima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Primary synovial sarcoma of the uterus.

Authors:  Pavel Dundr; Daniela Fischerová; Ctibor Povýšil; Daniel Tvrdík; David Cibula
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Malignant inguinal monophasic synovial sarcoma: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ji Xu; Jia Wang; Long Cui; Xiangru Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Role of genetic and molecular profiling in sarcomas.

Authors:  Scott M Norberg; Sujana Movva
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-05

5.  Soft tissue sarcoma clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Laurence H Baker; Derrick Beech; Robert Benjamin; Ephraim S Casper; Ernest U Conrad; Thomas F DeLaney; David S Ettinger; Martin J Heslin; Ray J Hutchinson; Krystyna Kiel; William G Kraybill; G Douglas Letson; James Neff; Richard J O'Donnell; I Benjamin Paz; Raphael E Pollock; R Lor Randall; Karen D Schupak; Douglas S Tyler; Margaret von Mehren; Jeffrey Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 6.  Synovial sarcoma of the spine: a case involving paraspinal muscle with extensive calcification and the surgical consideration in treatment.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Yoon-La Choi; Go Eun Bae; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) expression in synovial sarcomas as a promising indicator of prognosis.

Authors:  Ulviye Yalçınkaya; Nesrin Uğraş; Gonca Özgün; Gökhan Ocakoğlu; Adem Deligönül; Sibel Kahraman Çetintaş; Muhammed Sadık Bilgen
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 8.  Gene translocations in musculoskeletal neoplasms.

Authors:  Balaji Krishnan; Gaurav Khanna; Denis Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Synovial sarcoma: from genetics to genetic-based animal modeling.

Authors:  Malay Haldar; R Lor Randall; Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Genomic characteristics of soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Fredrik Mertens; Ioannis Panagopoulos; Nils Mandahl
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.