Literature DB >> 15364554

The use of closure devices.

Steven G Katz1, Alan Abando.   

Abstract

The use of arterial closure devices offers significant benefits over manual compression in achieving groin hemostasis following catheter-based procedures. Several currently available devices provide rapid puncture site closure with complication rates similar to that of manual compression. Closure devices allow for early times to ambulation and hospital discharge, and have a high degree of patient satisfaction. Their use may be of particular benefit inpatients that are anticoagulated. We believe that their use should be strongly considered in all patients following femoral artery catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15364554     DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  3 in total

Review 1.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis.

Authors:  Pei-Jung Wu; Yu-Tzu Dai; Hsien-Li Kao; Chin-Hao Chang; Meei-Fang Lou
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  A Novel Intervention to Treat Failed Angio-Seal Footplate Deployment: Two Case Series.

Authors:  Thomas C Hall; Said Habib
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.