Biofilm quantification on stone surfaces: comparison of various methods.

In the present study, the efficacy of three different methods of estimating biofilm biomass on stone (amount of chlorophyll a, fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis and changes in colour) is discussed. Stone samples were sprayed with solutions of cyanobacteria and the actual microbial biomass--determined by cell culture--was compared with the biomass estimated using the different methods. Statistically significant differences between actual biomass and that estimated from the fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis method invalidate its use. However, although the results indicated the amount of chlorophyll to be a good estimator of biofilm biomass, problems in the total extraction of chlorophyll from the stone cannot be overlooked. Determination of changes in colour was found to be a good method of quantifying biofilms growing on stone.