Literature DB >> 15364269

Comparison of two new rapid antigen detection assays for respiratory syncytial virus with another assay and shell vial culture.

Xiaotian Zheng1, Susanne Quianzon, Yan Mu, Ben Z Katz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major viral pathogen causing lower respiratory tract infection in young children. Early detection allows cohorting of infected inpatients to prevent nosocomial transmission and consideration of treatment. To achieve rapid reporting, antigen detection has been widely used. Since late 2002, the FDA approved two new RSV antigen detection tests, the Now RSV test (Binax) and the Directigen EZ RSV (Becton Dickinson), both of which promised reduced hands-on processing.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate relative performance of the two new rapid antigen detection assays. STUDY
DESIGN: To compare the performance of these newer tests with a previously existing antigen detection test (Becton Dickinson) and shell vial viral culture with clinical specimens. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 89 fresh respiratory specimens from 84 pediatric patients were tested. We also performed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on all culture negative but antigen positive samples as well as 26 specimens that were negative on both shell vial culture and antigen testings. Overall, the three antigen assays performed similarly well. The hands-on processing for the two newer tests was significantly reduced, making them more convenient for rapid screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15364269     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Chartrand; Nicolas Tremblay; Christian Renaud; Jesse Papenburg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods.

Authors:  James B Mahony
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Prospective evaluation of rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus infections.

Authors:  Jaber Aslanzadeh; Xiaotian Zheng; Haijing Li; Janice Tetreault; Irene Ratkiewicz; Shufang Meng; Pamela Hamilton; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Respiratory syncytial virus detection by Remel Xpect, Binax Now RSV, direct immunofluorescent staining, and tissue culture.

Authors:  Anita P Borek; Susan H Clemens; Valerie K Gaskins; Deborah Z Aird; Alexandra Valsamakis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

Authors:  R S Liao; L L Tomalty; A Majury; D E Zoutman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of a rapid assay (Binax NOW) for detection of respiratory syncytial virus at a children's hospital over a 3-year period.

Authors:  Andrea T Cruz; Andreea C Cazacu; Jewel M Greer; Gail J Demmler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Simultaneous detection and differentiation of respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viral pathogens.

Authors:  Susan E Sefers; Haijing Li; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 8.  Emerging advances in rapid diagnostics of respiratory infections.

Authors:  David R Murdoch; Lance C Jennings; Niranjan Bhat; Trevor P Anderson
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.982

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.