BACKGROUND: We previously reported that an identification of sentinel lymph node (SN) with a techenetium-99m (99mTc) tin colloid by ex vivo counting, i.e. the radio-activity of dissected lymph nodes, was a reliable method of establishing the first site of nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer [J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 124(2002)486]. However, for SN navigation surgery, SN should be identified before lymph node dissection (in vivo) but not after that (ex vivo). In order to reduce mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by SN navigation surgery, the SN identifications for hilar lymph nodes by ex vivo counting, and for mediastinal lymph nodes by in vivo, were evaluated. METHODS: Intra-operative SN identification using 99mTc tin colloid was conducted on 104 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who had had major lung resections with mediastinal lymph node dissections. The hilar SNs were identified by ex vivo counting (after lung resection) and the mediastinal SNs were identified by in vivo counting (before lymph node dissection). To evaluate the accuracy of mediastinal SN identification by in vivo counting, it was compared with the data by ex vivo counting. RESULTS: SNs were identified in 84 patients (81%). SNs were identified at the hilum by ex vivo counting in 78 patients (93%) and at the mediastinum by in vivo counting in 40 patients (48%). While 15 patients had lymph node metastases, i.e. N1 in six and N2 in nine, the SNs could be found to have metastases during operation in 13 of the 15 patients (87%). The in vivo counting of the mediastinum missed out the mediastinal SNs identified by ex vivo counting in four of the 84 patients (5%). CONCLUSION: If the hilar SNs identified by ex vivo counting and the mediastinal SNs identified by in vivo counting had no metastases, then mediastinal lymph node dissection could be abbreviated for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC.
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that an identification of sentinel lymph node (SN) with a techenetium-99m (99mTc) tin colloid by ex vivo counting, i.e. the radio-activity of dissected lymph nodes, was a reliable method of establishing the first site of nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer [J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 124(2002)486]. However, for SN navigation surgery, SN should be identified before lymph node dissection (in vivo) but not after that (ex vivo). In order to reduce mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by SN navigation surgery, the SN identifications for hilar lymph nodes by ex vivo counting, and for mediastinal lymph nodes by in vivo, were evaluated. METHODS: Intra-operative SN identification using 99mTc tin colloid was conducted on 104 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who had had major lung resections with mediastinal lymph node dissections. The hilar SNs were identified by ex vivo counting (after lung resection) and the mediastinal SNs were identified by in vivo counting (before lymph node dissection). To evaluate the accuracy of mediastinal SN identification by in vivo counting, it was compared with the data by ex vivo counting. RESULTS: SNs were identified in 84 patients (81%). SNs were identified at the hilum by ex vivo counting in 78 patients (93%) and at the mediastinum by in vivo counting in 40 patients (48%). While 15 patients had lymph node metastases, i.e. N1 in six and N2 in nine, the SNs could be found to have metastases during operation in 13 of the 15 patients (87%). The in vivo counting of the mediastinum missed out the mediastinal SNs identified by ex vivo counting in four of the 84 patients (5%). CONCLUSION: If the hilar SNs identified by ex vivo counting and the mediastinal SNs identified by in vivo counting had no metastases, then mediastinal lymph node dissection could be abbreviated for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC.
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754