Literature DB >> 15363236

[A prospective study of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft versus autograft].

Kang Sun1, Ji-wen Tang, Qiang Xu, Xiao-yang Liu, Lu-gang Zhou, Yong-qiang Hao, Li Wang, Yu-jie Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes and differences of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by using allografts and autografts.
METHODS: Fifty-three patients with grade III ACL injuries were divided randomly into 2 groups. Twenty-five cases of group A with autografts of patellar bone-tendon-bone (B-PT-B;n = 15) and 4 strands of semitendinosus/gracilis (n = 10); 28 patients of group B with allografts of B-PT-B (n = 18), 4 strands of semitendinosus/2 strands of gracilis tendons (n = 6) and double tibialis posterior (n = 4) as well as Achilles bone-tendon (n = 2). All procedures were performed endoscopically by some surgeons. All patients were followed up for 12 to 31 months, average 19 months.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences revealed in physical examination. IKDC and Lysholm-Tegner Score as well as KT-2000 testing was used preoperation and postoperation for both group, but there were no significant differences between the two groups except that group B had less time in operation and longer time in postoperative fever comparing with group A. (2-sample t test, P < 0.05). The KT-2000 side to side difference less than 3 mm were 88% and 86% and more than 5 mm were 4% and 7.1% respectively. The infection rates were 0% and 3.5% for the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of the allografts and autografts in ACL reconstruction is almost the same. Allografts are a reasonably alternative choice for ACL reconstruction in patients over middle ages and for multiple ligament surgery as well as revision procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15363236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 0529-5815


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft.

Authors:  James L Carey; Warren R Dunn; Diane L Dahm; Scott L Zeger; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A Systematic Review of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Compared With Allograft in Young Patients.

Authors:  David Wasserstein; Ujash Sheth; Alison Cabrera; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yudi Wu; Yajia Li; Jia Guo; Qianxiang Li; Jianhuang Wu; Ziqin Cao; Yulin Song
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Aseptically processed and chemically sterilized BTB allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Peter A Indelicato; Michael G Ciccotti; Joel Boyd; Laurence D Higgins; Benjamin S Shaffer; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.