Literature DB >> 15363081

Comparison of efficacy of reverse remodeling and clinical improvement for relatively narrow and wide QRS complexes after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure.

Cheuk-Man Yu1, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, Chi-Kin Chan, Yat-Sun Chan, Qing Zhang, Hong Lin, Gabriel W K Yip, Leo C C Kum, Shun-Ling Kong, Yan Zhang, John E Sanderson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and improve symptoms in heart failure patients with wide QRS complexes; however, its role in patients with mildly prolonged QRS complexes is unclear. This study investigated if CRT benefited patients with mildly prolonged QRS complexes >120 to 150 ms and explored if the severity of systolic asynchrony determined such a response. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (age 66 +/- 11 years, 66% male) who had undergone CRT were studied prospectively. Of these patients, 27 had QRS duration between 120 and 150 ms (group A), and 31 had QRS duration >150 ms (group B). Tissue Doppler echocardiography and clinical assessment were performed at baseline and 3 months after CRT. Both groups had significant reduction of LV volume and increased ejection fraction, +dP/dt, and sphericity index (all P < 0.05). These improvements were greater in group B and were explained by the higher prevalence of systolic intraventricular asynchrony. Significant reverse remodeling (reduction of LV end-systolic volume >15%) was evident in 46% of group A patients and 68% of group B patients. Improvement in clinical endpoints was observed in both groups (all P < 0.01), although the changes in metabolic equivalent and New York Heart Association functional class were greater in group B. In both groups, systolic asynchrony index (TS-SD) was the most important predictor of reverse remodeling (r =-0.78, P < 0.001) and was the only independent predictor in the multivariate model (beta=-1.80, confidence interval =-2.18 to -1.42, P < 0.001); QRS duration was not. A predefined TS-SD value >32.6 ms had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 83% to predict reverse remodeling. Improvement of intraventricular asynchrony after CRT was evident only in responders (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Improvement of LV remodeling and clinical status is evident after CRT in heart failure patients with QRS duration >120 to 150 ms. These responders are closely predicted by the severity of prepacing intraventricular asynchrony but not QRS duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15363081     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  16 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Robert H Helm; David A Kass
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  [Cardiac resynchronization therapy: preoperative screening. How can we reliably predict response to CRT?].

Authors:  M Kindermann; F Mahfoud; C Ukena; G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

3.  Relationship between left ventricular dyssynchrony and reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Umut Celikyurt; Ahmet Vural; Tayfun Sahin; Teoman Kilic; Aysen Agacdiken; Dilek Ural
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Agreement is poor among current criteria used to define response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Brandon K Fornwalt; William W Sprague; Patrick BeDell; Jonathan D Suever; Bart Gerritse; John D Merlino; Derek A Fyfe; Angel R León; John N Oshinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of patient selection.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Aaron S Kelly; Kevin V Burns; Stuart W Adler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Association of corrected QT dispersion with symptoms improvement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Hina; Hiroshi Kawamura; Takashi Murakami; Keizo Yamamoto; Hirosuke Yamaji; Masaaki Murakami; Satoshi Hirohata; Hiroko Ogawa; Kohsuke Sakane; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony After Acute Myocardial Infarction is a Powerful Indicator of Left Ventricular Remodeling.

Authors:  Jum Suk Ko; Myung Ho Jeong; Min Goo Lee; Shin Eun Lee; Won Yu Kang; Soo Hyun Kim; Keun-Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Yoon; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Correlation of mechanical dyssynchrony with QRS duration measured by signal-averaged electrocardiography.

Authors:  George K Andrikopoulos; Stylianos Tzeis; Christof Kolb; Dimitrios Sakellariou; Dimosthenes Avramides; Evangelos C Alexopoulos; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Cross-correlation delay to quantify myocardial dyssynchrony from phase contrast magnetic resonance (PCMR) velocity data.

Authors:  Jana G Delfino; Brandon K Fornwalt; Robert L Eisner; Angel R Leon; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Fragmented narrow QRS complex: predictor of left ventricular dyssynchrony in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jamal Yusuf; Devendra Kumar Agrawal; Saibal Mukhopadhyay; Vimal Mehta; Vijay Trehan; Sanjay Tyagi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.