OBJECTIVE: The Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease characterizes COPD as airflow limitation caused by parenchymal destruction and/or small airway disease. This report characterizes the clinical features of these two phenotypes of COPD in Japan. METHODOLOGY: COPD was diagnosed by spirometric airflow limitation (FEV(1)/FVC < 70%), and all subjects underwent chest CT scanning. Patients with diffuse low attenuation areas (LAA) on CT scan were categorized as the emphysema-dominant phenotype; those with little LAA were categorized as the airway disease-dominant phenotype. The two groups were compared to identify significant clinical or demographic differences. RESULTS: Of the 1438 patients analysed, 1294 (90%) were classified as having an emphysema-dominant phenotype and 144 (10%) as having an airway disease-dominant phenotype. The airway disease-dominant phenotype was: more common than the emphysema-dominant phenotype in women (15%vs. 7%, P < 0.01) and in non-smokers (6%vs. 2%, P < 0.05); was more commonly complicated by asthmatic features (35%vs. 21%, P < 0.01); and had higher IgE and eosinophil levels (P < 0.05) and less lung function impairment. CONCLUSION: This analysis is the first to clinically define two phenotypes of COPD in a Japanese epidemiological survey. There appear to be striking differences as well as overlap between these two groups. Further research is warranted to determine the significance of COPD phenotypes.
OBJECTIVE: The Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease characterizes COPD as airflow limitation caused by parenchymal destruction and/or small airway disease. This report characterizes the clinical features of these two phenotypes of COPD in Japan. METHODOLOGY:COPD was diagnosed by spirometric airflow limitation (FEV(1)/FVC < 70%), and all subjects underwent chest CT scanning. Patients with diffuse low attenuation areas (LAA) on CT scan were categorized as the emphysema-dominant phenotype; those with little LAA were categorized as the airway disease-dominant phenotype. The two groups were compared to identify significant clinical or demographic differences. RESULTS: Of the 1438 patients analysed, 1294 (90%) were classified as having an emphysema-dominant phenotype and 144 (10%) as having an airway disease-dominant phenotype. The airway disease-dominant phenotype was: more common than the emphysema-dominant phenotype in women (15%vs. 7%, P < 0.01) and in non-smokers (6%vs. 2%, P < 0.05); was more commonly complicated by asthmatic features (35%vs. 21%, P < 0.01); and had higher IgE and eosinophil levels (P < 0.05) and less lung function impairment. CONCLUSION: This analysis is the first to clinically define two phenotypes of COPD in a Japanese epidemiological survey. There appear to be striking differences as well as overlap between these two groups. Further research is warranted to determine the significance of COPD phenotypes.
Authors: Song Soo Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Ho Yun Lee; Dipti V Nevrekar; Anna V Forssen; James D Crapo; Joyce D Schroeder; David A Lynch Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Megan Hardin; Marilyn Foreman; Mark T Dransfield; Nadia Hansel; MeiLan K Han; Michael H Cho; Surya P Bhatt; Joe Ramsdell; David Lynch; Jeffrey L Curtis; Edwin K Silverman; George Washko; Dawn DeMeo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 16.671