Literature DB >> 15362992

Evaluation of arthrocentesis site bacterial flora before and after 4 methods of preparation in horses with and without evidence of skin contamination.

Chad J Zubrod1, Kelly D Farnsworth, J Lindsay Oaks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of four methods of povidone-iodine preparation on skin bacterial flora of arthrocentesis sites, in horses, with and without evidence of skin contamination. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. ANIMALS: Twenty-four adult horses.
METHODS: Horses were assigned to either the clean or contaminated group based on housing environment and visual evidence of contamination. Using a moist sterile swab, microbial culture samples were obtained from the skin over the distal interphalangeal joints immediately before and after preparation. Each site was aseptically prepared with 1 of 4 povidone-iodine techniques: 10-minutes scrub, 5-minutes scrub, three 30-second scrubs, or commercial one-step iodophor surgical solution. Colony forming units (CFUs) were determined for each sample, 24 hours after inoculation, on blood agar plates.
RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) pre-scrub CFUs/mL was significantly higher in the contaminated group (9588.33+/-1223.65) compared with the clean group (4489.00+/-3842.03) (P<.01). After preparation of the arthrocentesis sites, there were no significant differences in post-scrub CFUs/mL among the 10 minutes (mean clean, 46.00+/-64.36; mean contaminated, 28.67+/-18.04), 5 minutes (mean clean, 84.17+/-109.80; mean contaminated, 40.33+/-44.52), three 30 seconds povidone-iodine scrubs (mean clean, 95.50+/-172.29; mean contaminated, 46.67+/-56.94), or application of a commercial one-step iodophor surgical solution (mean clean, 102.17+/-161.78; mean contaminated 117.67+/-143.78); or between the clean (81.96+/-131.69) and contaminated groups (58.33+/-85.90) (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Preparation of the distal interphalangeal joint arthrocentesis site with each of these techniques significantly reduces the bacterial flora to a similar level for arthrocentesis in horses with and without evidence of skin contamination. Clinical Relevance- Aseptic preparation of the skin over the distal interphalangeal joint may be accomplished with any of these techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362992     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of 4 Presurgical Skin Preparation Methods in Mice.

Authors:  Brenda L Kick; Sanjeev Gumber; Heqiong Wang; Reneé H Moore; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Inadvertent Introduction of Tissue Coring Into Joints During Arthrocentesis: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Chi Xu; Haiwen Peng; Wei Chai; Xiang Li; Rui Li; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-07-22

3.  Distribution of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci (MRCoPS) in a surgical unit and cystotomy operation sites in a veterinary teaching hospital.

Authors:  Punpichaya Fungwithaya; Pasakorn Brikshavana; Pattrarat Chanchaithong; Nuvee Prapasarakul
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Comparison of equine synovial sepsis rate following intrasynovial injection in ambulatory versus hospital settings.

Authors:  Danielle M Krause; Lynn M Pezzanite; Gregg M Griffenhagen; Dean A Hendrickson
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Influence of clipping on bacterial contamination of canine arthrocentesis sites before and after skin preparation.

Authors:  Justin M Lavallée; Cindy Shmon; Hugues Beaufrère; Manuel Chirino-Trejo; Kathleen Linn
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.495

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.